“So, what test do you prefer?” Negotiating politic behaviour in an L2 prenatal genetic counselling setting in Hong Kong

Olga A. ZAYTS, Munkyung Agnes KANG

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research in the field of politeness studies indicates that different discourse genres are characterized by different degrees of adherence to politeness rules (Lakoff 1989). In the genetic counselling setting, we propose that verbal behaviour should be analyzed within a broader framework of politic verbal behaviour (Watts 1989, 2003). We examine an L2 English context in Hong Kong to illustrate how the sociocultural context shapes the notion of politic behaviour. By sociocultural context, we are referring to the combination of language used, in this case English as a second language, the background of the interactants, and the institutional setting in which the interactions take place. In genetic counselling, politic behaviour is influenced by two well-established concepts: informed choice and nondirective counselling. Informed choice concerns the decision that a pregnant woman makes regarding genetic screening and testing. Nondirectiveness reflects the autonomous nature of the choice and the fact that the health care provider should act as a facilitator of the woman's choice, avoiding any imposition. Given these institutional goals, we discuss how health care providers negotiate politic behaviour to facilitate the decision-making process and illustrate that considerations of language and participant background take precedence over nondirectiveness in this L2 context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-51
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetic Counseling
Negotiating
Hong Kong
Health care
Verbal Behavior
counseling
language behavior
Language
politeness
Genetic Testing
Health Personnel
language
health care
Screening
Decision making
decision-making process
Counseling
Pregnant Women
genre
Decision Making

Keywords

  • genetic counselling; informed choice; nondirective counselling; non-native speaker interaction; politic behaviour; L2 context

Cite this

@article{a08c8f4de1514fc4b7e175ab64858972,
title = "“So, what test do you prefer?” Negotiating politic behaviour in an L2 prenatal genetic counselling setting in Hong Kong",
abstract = "Previous research in the field of politeness studies indicates that different discourse genres are characterized by different degrees of adherence to politeness rules (Lakoff 1989). In the genetic counselling setting, we propose that verbal behaviour should be analyzed within a broader framework of politic verbal behaviour (Watts 1989, 2003). We examine an L2 English context in Hong Kong to illustrate how the sociocultural context shapes the notion of politic behaviour. By sociocultural context, we are referring to the combination of language used, in this case English as a second language, the background of the interactants, and the institutional setting in which the interactions take place. In genetic counselling, politic behaviour is influenced by two well-established concepts: informed choice and nondirective counselling. Informed choice concerns the decision that a pregnant woman makes regarding genetic screening and testing. Nondirectiveness reflects the autonomous nature of the choice and the fact that the health care provider should act as a facilitator of the woman's choice, avoiding any imposition. Given these institutional goals, we discuss how health care providers negotiate politic behaviour to facilitate the decision-making process and illustrate that considerations of language and participant background take precedence over nondirectiveness in this L2 context.",
keywords = "genetic counselling; informed choice; nondirective counselling; non-native speaker interaction; politic behaviour; L2 context",
author = "ZAYTS, {Olga A.} and KANG, {Munkyung Agnes}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/JPLR.2009.003",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "33--51",
journal = "Journal of Politeness Research",
issn = "1612-5681",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

“So, what test do you prefer?” Negotiating politic behaviour in an L2 prenatal genetic counselling setting in Hong Kong. / ZAYTS, Olga A.; KANG, Munkyung Agnes.

In: Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 33-51.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “So, what test do you prefer?” Negotiating politic behaviour in an L2 prenatal genetic counselling setting in Hong Kong

AU - ZAYTS, Olga A.

AU - KANG, Munkyung Agnes

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Previous research in the field of politeness studies indicates that different discourse genres are characterized by different degrees of adherence to politeness rules (Lakoff 1989). In the genetic counselling setting, we propose that verbal behaviour should be analyzed within a broader framework of politic verbal behaviour (Watts 1989, 2003). We examine an L2 English context in Hong Kong to illustrate how the sociocultural context shapes the notion of politic behaviour. By sociocultural context, we are referring to the combination of language used, in this case English as a second language, the background of the interactants, and the institutional setting in which the interactions take place. In genetic counselling, politic behaviour is influenced by two well-established concepts: informed choice and nondirective counselling. Informed choice concerns the decision that a pregnant woman makes regarding genetic screening and testing. Nondirectiveness reflects the autonomous nature of the choice and the fact that the health care provider should act as a facilitator of the woman's choice, avoiding any imposition. Given these institutional goals, we discuss how health care providers negotiate politic behaviour to facilitate the decision-making process and illustrate that considerations of language and participant background take precedence over nondirectiveness in this L2 context.

AB - Previous research in the field of politeness studies indicates that different discourse genres are characterized by different degrees of adherence to politeness rules (Lakoff 1989). In the genetic counselling setting, we propose that verbal behaviour should be analyzed within a broader framework of politic verbal behaviour (Watts 1989, 2003). We examine an L2 English context in Hong Kong to illustrate how the sociocultural context shapes the notion of politic behaviour. By sociocultural context, we are referring to the combination of language used, in this case English as a second language, the background of the interactants, and the institutional setting in which the interactions take place. In genetic counselling, politic behaviour is influenced by two well-established concepts: informed choice and nondirective counselling. Informed choice concerns the decision that a pregnant woman makes regarding genetic screening and testing. Nondirectiveness reflects the autonomous nature of the choice and the fact that the health care provider should act as a facilitator of the woman's choice, avoiding any imposition. Given these institutional goals, we discuss how health care providers negotiate politic behaviour to facilitate the decision-making process and illustrate that considerations of language and participant background take precedence over nondirectiveness in this L2 context.

KW - genetic counselling; informed choice; nondirective counselling; non-native speaker interaction; politic behaviour; L2 context

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3012

U2 - 10.1515/JPLR.2009.003

DO - 10.1515/JPLR.2009.003

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 5

SP - 33

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Politeness Research

JF - Journal of Politeness Research

SN - 1612-5681

IS - 1

ER -