Abstract
Top-down visual attention filters undesired stimuli while selected information is afforded the lion’s share of limited cognitive resources. Multiple selection mechanisms can be deployed simultaneously, but how unique influences of each combine to facilitate behavior remains unclear. Previously, we failed to observe an additive perceptual benefit when both space-based attention (SBA) and feature-based attention (FBA) were cued in a sparse display (Liang & Scolari, 2020): FBA was restricted to higher order decision-making processes when combined with a valid spatial cue, whereas SBA additionally facilitated target enhancement. Here, we introduced a series of design modifications across three experiments to elicit both attention mechanisms within signal enhancement while also investigating the impacts on decision making. First, we found that when highly reliable spatial and feature cues made unique contributions to search (experiment 1), or when each cue component was moderately reliable (experiments 2a and 2b), both mechanisms were deployed independently to resolve the target. However, the same manipulations produced interactive attention effects within other latent decision-making components that depended on the probability of the integrated cueing object. Time spent before evidence accumulation was reduced and responses were more conservative for the most likely pre-cue combination—even when it included an invalid component. These data indicate that selection mechanisms operate on sensory signals invariably in an independent manner, whereas a higher-order dependency occurs outside of signal enhancement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Vision |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | Jan 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Authors
Keywords
- Drift diffusion model
- Feature-based attention
- Perceptual decision making
- Space-based attention