Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the concept of a stance with that of a paradigm qua disciplinary matrix, in an attempt to illuminate both notions. First, it considers to what extent it is appropriate to draw an analogy between stances (which operate at the level of the individual) and disciplinary matrices (which operate at the level of the community). It suggests that despite first appearances, a disciplinary matrix is not simply a stance writ large. Second, it examines how we might reinterpret disciplinary matrices in terms of stances, and shows how doing so can provide us with a better insight into non-revolutionary science. Finally, it identifies two directions for future research: “Can the rationality of scientific revolutions be understood in terms of the dynamic between stances and paradigms?” and “Do stances help us to understand incommensurability between disciplinary matrices?”
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 111-119 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Synthese |
Volume | 178 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
I am grateful to the British Academy for supporting my work on this paper by way of a Small Research Grant, and to Peter Baumann, Tony Booth, and Otávio Bueno for comments on earlier versions.Keywords
- Extraordinary science
- Kuhn
- Normal science
- Paradigms
- Stances
- van Fraassen