TY - JOUR
T1 - Static, dynamic, and adaptive heterogeneity in distributed smart camera networks
AU - LEWIS, Peter R.
AU - ESTERLE, Lukas
AU - CHANDRA, Arjun
AU - RINNER, Bernhard
AU - TORRESEN, Jim
AU - YAO, Xin
PY - 2015/6/9
Y1 - 2015/6/9
N2 - We study heterogeneity among nodes in self-organizing smart camera networks, which use strategies based on social and economic knowledge to target communication activity efficiently. We compare homogeneous configurations, when cameras use the same strategy, with heterogeneous configurations, when cameras use different strategies. Our first contribution is to establish that static heterogeneity leads to new outcomes that are more efficient than those possible with homogeneity. Next, two forms of dynamic heterogeneity are investigated: nonadaptive mixed strategies and adaptive strategies, which learn online. Our second contribution is to show that mixed strategies offer Pareto efficiency consistently comparable with the most efficient static heterogeneous configurations. Since the particular configuration required for high Pareto efficiency in a scenario will not be known in advance, our third contribution is to show how decentralized online learning can lead to more efficient outcomes than the homogeneous case. In some cases, outcomes from online learning were more efficient than all other evaluated configuration types. Our fourth contribution is to show that online learning typically leads to outcomes more evenly spread over the objective space. Our results provide insight into the relationship between static, dynamic, and adaptive heterogeneity, suggesting that all have a key role in achieving efficient self-organization. © 2015 ACM.
AB - We study heterogeneity among nodes in self-organizing smart camera networks, which use strategies based on social and economic knowledge to target communication activity efficiently. We compare homogeneous configurations, when cameras use the same strategy, with heterogeneous configurations, when cameras use different strategies. Our first contribution is to establish that static heterogeneity leads to new outcomes that are more efficient than those possible with homogeneity. Next, two forms of dynamic heterogeneity are investigated: nonadaptive mixed strategies and adaptive strategies, which learn online. Our second contribution is to show that mixed strategies offer Pareto efficiency consistently comparable with the most efficient static heterogeneous configurations. Since the particular configuration required for high Pareto efficiency in a scenario will not be known in advance, our third contribution is to show how decentralized online learning can lead to more efficient outcomes than the homogeneous case. In some cases, outcomes from online learning were more efficient than all other evaluated configuration types. Our fourth contribution is to show that online learning typically leads to outcomes more evenly spread over the objective space. Our results provide insight into the relationship between static, dynamic, and adaptive heterogeneity, suggesting that all have a key role in achieving efficient self-organization. © 2015 ACM.
KW - Distributed smart cameras
KW - Heterogeneity
KW - Learning
KW - Self-organization
KW - Variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930983945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2764460
DO - 10.1145/2764460
M3 - Journal Article (refereed)
SN - 1556-4665
VL - 10
JO - ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
JF - ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
IS - 2
M1 - 8
ER -