Sub- and trans-national actors in South Korea's island disputes : the cases of Dokdo and Iŏdo

Chien-peng CHUNG, Jeongwon Bourdais PARK

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper provides a political analysis on two territorial disputes that South Korea has with Japan over Dokdo/Takeshima and with China over Iŏdo/Suyan Rocks, as well as on their implications for the Northeast Asia region, focusing on the roles of sub-state actors and the United States as a third party trans-national actor. It mainly explores why South Koreans consider territorial claims by Japan and China such an affront as to require strident demonstration of ownership, especially since they already exercise effective control over the territories under dispute. It also explores what actions the South Korean government would take in the event of maneuvers or attempted landings by security forces or nationalists/fishing boats from China on Iŏdo or Japan on Dokdo. Employing Robert Putnam's Two Level Game Framework, the paper provides comparative insights on how these cases have been developed to date through interactions between Level I, official negotiators, and Level II, sub- and trans-national actors. The two cases demonstrate that the state is not a unified actor, and non-state actors' nationalistic collective sentiment has played (and will play) a greater role in shaping the directions of (potential) conflicts over Dokdo and Iŏdo.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-29
Number of pages21
JournalAsian Affairs: An American Review
Volume44
Issue number1
Early online date10 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

South Korea
Japan
China
conflict potential
event
interaction

Cite this

@article{5a897c46700f4e95adfdd780f40d99ad,
title = "Sub- and trans-national actors in South Korea's island disputes : the cases of Dokdo and Iŏdo",
abstract = "This paper provides a political analysis on two territorial disputes that South Korea has with Japan over Dokdo/Takeshima and with China over Iŏdo/Suyan Rocks, as well as on their implications for the Northeast Asia region, focusing on the roles of sub-state actors and the United States as a third party trans-national actor. It mainly explores why South Koreans consider territorial claims by Japan and China such an affront as to require strident demonstration of ownership, especially since they already exercise effective control over the territories under dispute. It also explores what actions the South Korean government would take in the event of maneuvers or attempted landings by security forces or nationalists/fishing boats from China on Iŏdo or Japan on Dokdo. Employing Robert Putnam's Two Level Game Framework, the paper provides comparative insights on how these cases have been developed to date through interactions between Level I, official negotiators, and Level II, sub- and trans-national actors. The two cases demonstrate that the state is not a unified actor, and non-state actors' nationalistic collective sentiment has played (and will play) a greater role in shaping the directions of (potential) conflicts over Dokdo and Iŏdo.",
author = "Chien-peng CHUNG and PARK, {Jeongwon Bourdais}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/00927678.2017.1283629",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "9--29",
journal = "Asian Affairs",
issn = "0092-7678",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Sub- and trans-national actors in South Korea's island disputes : the cases of Dokdo and Iŏdo. / CHUNG, Chien-peng; PARK, Jeongwon Bourdais.

In: Asian Affairs: An American Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2017, p. 9-29.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sub- and trans-national actors in South Korea's island disputes : the cases of Dokdo and Iŏdo

AU - CHUNG, Chien-peng

AU - PARK, Jeongwon Bourdais

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper provides a political analysis on two territorial disputes that South Korea has with Japan over Dokdo/Takeshima and with China over Iŏdo/Suyan Rocks, as well as on their implications for the Northeast Asia region, focusing on the roles of sub-state actors and the United States as a third party trans-national actor. It mainly explores why South Koreans consider territorial claims by Japan and China such an affront as to require strident demonstration of ownership, especially since they already exercise effective control over the territories under dispute. It also explores what actions the South Korean government would take in the event of maneuvers or attempted landings by security forces or nationalists/fishing boats from China on Iŏdo or Japan on Dokdo. Employing Robert Putnam's Two Level Game Framework, the paper provides comparative insights on how these cases have been developed to date through interactions between Level I, official negotiators, and Level II, sub- and trans-national actors. The two cases demonstrate that the state is not a unified actor, and non-state actors' nationalistic collective sentiment has played (and will play) a greater role in shaping the directions of (potential) conflicts over Dokdo and Iŏdo.

AB - This paper provides a political analysis on two territorial disputes that South Korea has with Japan over Dokdo/Takeshima and with China over Iŏdo/Suyan Rocks, as well as on their implications for the Northeast Asia region, focusing on the roles of sub-state actors and the United States as a third party trans-national actor. It mainly explores why South Koreans consider territorial claims by Japan and China such an affront as to require strident demonstration of ownership, especially since they already exercise effective control over the territories under dispute. It also explores what actions the South Korean government would take in the event of maneuvers or attempted landings by security forces or nationalists/fishing boats from China on Iŏdo or Japan on Dokdo. Employing Robert Putnam's Two Level Game Framework, the paper provides comparative insights on how these cases have been developed to date through interactions between Level I, official negotiators, and Level II, sub- and trans-national actors. The two cases demonstrate that the state is not a unified actor, and non-state actors' nationalistic collective sentiment has played (and will play) a greater role in shaping the directions of (potential) conflicts over Dokdo and Iŏdo.

UR - https://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7342

U2 - 10.1080/00927678.2017.1283629

DO - 10.1080/00927678.2017.1283629

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 44

SP - 9

EP - 29

JO - Asian Affairs

JF - Asian Affairs

SN - 0092-7678

IS - 1

ER -