"Super paradox" or "Leninist integration" : the politics of legislating Article 23 of Hong Kong's Basic Law

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Liao Zhengzhi, the late director of the Office of Hong Kong and Macau Affairs, once said that on the resumption of Hong Kong's sovereignty. Hong Kong needed only to change the flag and British governor. While the press was full of doomsday prophecies about Hong Kong's future, there was a camp of "super-paradox" theorists who genuinely believed that Hong Kong's status quo would not change after the handover. The authoritarian one party-dominated PRC, they asserted, could absorb a free-flowing Hong Kong without changing the nature of an open society. Contrary to doomsday prophets and "super-paradox" theorists, this article argues that while the doomsday prophecy was groundless, important institutional changes did take place even though they were barely noticed. It is argued, by using the example of the legislation of Article 23, that a gradual approach has been adopted by the Chinese Communist Party to change the fundamentals of Hong Kong's polity, a strategy that I call "Leninist integration."
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-95
Number of pages31
JournalAsian Perspective
Volume30
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Basic Law
Hong Kong
politics
prophecy
open society
communist party
institutional change
sovereignty
director
legislation

Cite this

@article{004edd36b85249b0bc9608a3d3ea5cde,
title = "{"}Super paradox{"} or {"}Leninist integration{"} : the politics of legislating Article 23 of Hong Kong's Basic Law",
abstract = "Liao Zhengzhi, the late director of the Office of Hong Kong and Macau Affairs, once said that on the resumption of Hong Kong's sovereignty. Hong Kong needed only to change the flag and British governor. While the press was full of doomsday prophecies about Hong Kong's future, there was a camp of {"}super-paradox{"} theorists who genuinely believed that Hong Kong's status quo would not change after the handover. The authoritarian one party-dominated PRC, they asserted, could absorb a free-flowing Hong Kong without changing the nature of an open society. Contrary to doomsday prophets and {"}super-paradox{"} theorists, this article argues that while the doomsday prophecy was groundless, important institutional changes did take place even though they were barely noticed. It is argued, by using the example of the legislation of Article 23, that a gradual approach has been adopted by the Chinese Communist Party to change the fundamentals of Hong Kong's polity, a strategy that I call {"}Leninist integration.{"}",
author = "WONG, {Yiu Chung}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "65--95",
journal = "Asian Perspective",
issn = "0258-9184",
publisher = "Lynne Rienner Publishers",
number = "2",

}

"Super paradox" or "Leninist integration" : the politics of legislating Article 23 of Hong Kong's Basic Law. / WONG, Yiu Chung.

In: Asian Perspective, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.06.2006, p. 65-95.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Super paradox" or "Leninist integration" : the politics of legislating Article 23 of Hong Kong's Basic Law

AU - WONG, Yiu Chung

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Liao Zhengzhi, the late director of the Office of Hong Kong and Macau Affairs, once said that on the resumption of Hong Kong's sovereignty. Hong Kong needed only to change the flag and British governor. While the press was full of doomsday prophecies about Hong Kong's future, there was a camp of "super-paradox" theorists who genuinely believed that Hong Kong's status quo would not change after the handover. The authoritarian one party-dominated PRC, they asserted, could absorb a free-flowing Hong Kong without changing the nature of an open society. Contrary to doomsday prophets and "super-paradox" theorists, this article argues that while the doomsday prophecy was groundless, important institutional changes did take place even though they were barely noticed. It is argued, by using the example of the legislation of Article 23, that a gradual approach has been adopted by the Chinese Communist Party to change the fundamentals of Hong Kong's polity, a strategy that I call "Leninist integration."

AB - Liao Zhengzhi, the late director of the Office of Hong Kong and Macau Affairs, once said that on the resumption of Hong Kong's sovereignty. Hong Kong needed only to change the flag and British governor. While the press was full of doomsday prophecies about Hong Kong's future, there was a camp of "super-paradox" theorists who genuinely believed that Hong Kong's status quo would not change after the handover. The authoritarian one party-dominated PRC, they asserted, could absorb a free-flowing Hong Kong without changing the nature of an open society. Contrary to doomsday prophets and "super-paradox" theorists, this article argues that while the doomsday prophecy was groundless, important institutional changes did take place even though they were barely noticed. It is argued, by using the example of the legislation of Article 23, that a gradual approach has been adopted by the Chinese Communist Party to change the fundamentals of Hong Kong's polity, a strategy that I call "Leninist integration."

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1860

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 30

SP - 65

EP - 95

JO - Asian Perspective

JF - Asian Perspective

SN - 0258-9184

IS - 2

ER -