Sustaining identities : Hong Kong and the politics of an Olympic boycott

Brian BRIDGES

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979 and the subsequent critical global focus on the 1980 Moscow Olympics placed Hong Kong and its aspiring Ohmpians in a dilemma. The Hong Kong government and the Hong Kong Amateur Sports Federation and Olympic Committee (ASF and OC) found themselves coming under multiple pressures as politics heavily intruded into sports. Facing international calls for a boycott of the Moscow Olympics, led by the USA but supported strongly by Mrs Thatcher’s British government, the Hong Kong government quickly fell into line. Even though the initial stages of the diplomatic sparring between Britain and China over Hong Kong's future had begun and China had only just rejoined the International Olympic Committee, China too was willing to support the boycott. However, the Hong Kong ASF and OC initially resisted, hoping still to be able to send athletes, but as Olympic ideals came up against political realities Hong Kong was forced to join in the international boycott. This article examines the roles of key players in Hong Kong, the external great power influences and the difficulties that Hong Kong faced in sustaining an ‘independent’ policy within the Olympic movement.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSport and Nationalism in Asia: Power, Politics and Identity
EditorsFan HONG, Zhouxiang LU
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter2
Pages4-17
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781315738536
ISBN (Print)9781138828148, 9780367738846
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Bibliographical note

Originally published in "The International Journal of the History of Sport", volume 31, issue 3 (February 2014), pp. 276-289. doi: 10.1080/09523367.2013.858705

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sustaining identities : Hong Kong and the politics of an Olympic boycott'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this