Teamwork and controversy in undergraduate management courses in Hong Kong : can the method reinforce the message?

Dean William TJOSVOLD, Shiu Ho, Alfred WONG, Roger NIBLER, James Stuart POUNDER

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Teams are increasingly recognized as critical for strategy, innovation, and other key organizational activities. This study used the theory of cooperation and competition to identify conditions that promote student team effectiveness in Hong Kong university undergraduate strategic management courses. Results from 70 teams across 12 classes indicate that groups with cooperative goals engaged in the open-minded constructive controversy; teams with independent goals avoided open discussion. Teams with a high level of constructive controversy rated themselves as effective; these teams also were rated as giving high quality presentations as measured by instructors’ marks but this result was not statistically significant. These results suggest that structuring cooperative teams can help students perform well in the classroom and may help prepared them to work in the emerging team organization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-138
Number of pages8
JournalSwiss Journal of Psychology
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2002

Keywords

  • constructive controversy
  • cooperation and competition
  • instructional methods
  • strategic management
  • student teams

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Teamwork and controversy in undergraduate management courses in Hong Kong : can the method reinforce the message?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this