Technological, economic and financial prospects of carbon dioxide capture in the cement industry

Jia LI*, Pradeep THARAKAN, Douglas MACDONALD, Xi LIANG

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cement is the second largest anthropogenic emission source, contributing approximately 7% of global CO2 emissions. Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) technology is considered by the International Energy Agency (IEA) as an essential technology capable of reducing CO2 emissions in the cement sector by 56% by 2050. The study compares CO2 capture technologies for the cement manufacturing process and analyses the economic and financial issues in deploying CO2 capture in the cement industry. Post-combustion capture with chemical absorption is regarded as a proven technology to capture CO2 from the calcination process. Oxyfuel is less mature but Oxyfuel partial capture-which only recycles O2/CO2 gas in the precalciner-is estimated to be more economic than post-combustion capture. Carbonate looping technologies are not yet commercial, but they have theoretical advantages in terms of energy consumption. In contrast with coal-fired power plants, CO2 capture in the cement industry benefits from a higher concentration of CO2 in the flue gas, but the benefit is offset by higher SOx and NOx levels and the smaller scale of emissions from each plant. Concerning the prospects for financing cement plant CO2 capture, large cement manufacturers on average have a higher ROE (return on equity) and lower debt ratio, thus a higher discount rate should be considered for the cost analysis than in power plants. IEA estimates that the incremental cost for deploying CCS to decarbonise the global cement sector is in the range US$350-840 billion. The cost estimates for deploying state-of-the art post-combustion CO2 capture technologies in cement plants are above $60 to avoid each tonne of CO2 emissions. However, the expectation is that the current market can only provide a minority of financial support for CO2 capture in cement plants. Public financial support and/or CO2 utilisation will be essential to trigger large-scale CCS demonstration projects in the cement industry. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1377-1387
Number of pages11
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume61
Early online date3 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Special thanks to Dr. Paul Fennell, Mr. Philip Curry and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable revision advice.

Funding

We appreciate the partial financial support provided by the Asian Development Bank through the ‘Determining the Potential for Carbon Capture and Storage Project in Southeast Asia’ project (TA-7575) and partial financial support by UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and Australia Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute (GCCSI) through the Guangdong CCS Readiness Project.

Keywords

  • Carbon capture
  • Cement
  • Techno-economic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technological, economic and financial prospects of carbon dioxide capture in the cement industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this