The aesthetic peculiarity of multifunctional artefacts

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Echoing a distinction made by David Wiggins in his discussion of the relation of identity, this paper investigates whether aesthetic adjectives such as 'beautiful' are sortal-relative or merely sortal-dependent. The hypothesis guiding the paper is that aesthetic adjectives, though probably sortal-dependent in general, are sortal-relative only when used to characterize multifunctional artefacts. This means that multifunctional artefacts should be unique in allowing the following situation to occur: for some object x there are sortals K and K' such that x is a beautiful K and also a K', but not a beautiful K'. Examples of multifunctional artefacts show that this is indeed a possibility. However, that multifunctional artefacts are unique in this respect will be demonstrated by a more principled argument, taking into account the nature of functions on the one hand, and the nature of artefact-classification on the other hand.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)412-425
    Number of pages14
    JournalBritish Journal of Aesthetics
    Volume45
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2005

    Fingerprint

    Artifact
    Aesthetics
    Sortals
    Adjective

    Cite this

    @article{454674794d5641c189be51be2cd345f8,
    title = "The aesthetic peculiarity of multifunctional artefacts",
    abstract = "Echoing a distinction made by David Wiggins in his discussion of the relation of identity, this paper investigates whether aesthetic adjectives such as 'beautiful' are sortal-relative or merely sortal-dependent. The hypothesis guiding the paper is that aesthetic adjectives, though probably sortal-dependent in general, are sortal-relative only when used to characterize multifunctional artefacts. This means that multifunctional artefacts should be unique in allowing the following situation to occur: for some object x there are sortals K and K' such that x is a beautiful K and also a K', but not a beautiful K'. Examples of multifunctional artefacts show that this is indeed a possibility. However, that multifunctional artefacts are unique in this respect will be demonstrated by a more principled argument, taking into account the nature of functions on the one hand, and the nature of artefact-classification on the other hand.",
    author = "{DE CLERCQ}, Rafael",
    year = "2005",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/aesthj/ayi051",
    language = "English",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "412--425",
    journal = "British Journal of Aesthetics",
    issn = "0007-0904",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    The aesthetic peculiarity of multifunctional artefacts. / DE CLERCQ, Rafael.

    In: British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.10.2005, p. 412-425.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The aesthetic peculiarity of multifunctional artefacts

    AU - DE CLERCQ, Rafael

    PY - 2005/10/1

    Y1 - 2005/10/1

    N2 - Echoing a distinction made by David Wiggins in his discussion of the relation of identity, this paper investigates whether aesthetic adjectives such as 'beautiful' are sortal-relative or merely sortal-dependent. The hypothesis guiding the paper is that aesthetic adjectives, though probably sortal-dependent in general, are sortal-relative only when used to characterize multifunctional artefacts. This means that multifunctional artefacts should be unique in allowing the following situation to occur: for some object x there are sortals K and K' such that x is a beautiful K and also a K', but not a beautiful K'. Examples of multifunctional artefacts show that this is indeed a possibility. However, that multifunctional artefacts are unique in this respect will be demonstrated by a more principled argument, taking into account the nature of functions on the one hand, and the nature of artefact-classification on the other hand.

    AB - Echoing a distinction made by David Wiggins in his discussion of the relation of identity, this paper investigates whether aesthetic adjectives such as 'beautiful' are sortal-relative or merely sortal-dependent. The hypothesis guiding the paper is that aesthetic adjectives, though probably sortal-dependent in general, are sortal-relative only when used to characterize multifunctional artefacts. This means that multifunctional artefacts should be unique in allowing the following situation to occur: for some object x there are sortals K and K' such that x is a beautiful K and also a K', but not a beautiful K'. Examples of multifunctional artefacts show that this is indeed a possibility. However, that multifunctional artefacts are unique in this respect will be demonstrated by a more principled argument, taking into account the nature of functions on the one hand, and the nature of artefact-classification on the other hand.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1876

    U2 - 10.1093/aesthj/ayi051

    DO - 10.1093/aesthj/ayi051

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 45

    SP - 412

    EP - 425

    JO - British Journal of Aesthetics

    JF - British Journal of Aesthetics

    SN - 0007-0904

    IS - 4

    ER -