Abstract
Echoing a distinction made by David Wiggins in his discussion of the relation of identity, this paper investigates whether aesthetic adjectives such as 'beautiful' are sortal-relative or merely sortal-dependent. The hypothesis guiding the paper is that aesthetic adjectives, though probably sortal-dependent in general, are sortal-relative only when used to characterize multifunctional artefacts. This means that multifunctional artefacts should be unique in allowing the following situation to occur: for some object x there are sortals K and K' such that x is a beautiful K and also a K', but not a beautiful K'. Examples of multifunctional artefacts show that this is indeed a possibility. However, that multifunctional artefacts are unique in this respect will be demonstrated by a more principled argument, taking into account the nature of functions on the one hand, and the nature of artefact-classification on the other hand.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 412-425 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | British Journal of Aesthetics |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The aesthetic peculiarity of multifunctional artefacts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver