I argue that a form of animalism that does not include the belief that ‘human animal’ is a substance-sortal has a dialectical advantage over other versions of animalism. The main reason for this advantage is that Phase Animalism, the version of animalism described here, has the theoretical resources to provide convincing descriptions of the outcomes of scenarios problematic for other forms of animalism. Although Phase Animalism rejects the claim that ‘human animal’ is a substance-sortal, it is still appealing to those who believe that our nature is continuous or of a similar kind to that of other physical entities.
|Number of pages||14|
|Journal||Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition|
|Early online date||20 Apr 2016|
|Publication status||Published - Jan 2017|
- Brain-transplant scenarios
- The corpse problem
- The remnant-person problem