The calculation of returns to research in distorted markets : comment

Jan Piaw, Thomas VOON, Geoff W. EDWARDS

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent article, Oehmke reported that a high internal rate of return for investment in research when the interaction between research and price policy costs was disregarded could become very low or even negative when the effects of research on the costs of price policy were considered. In this paper, the social returns from research in the presence of the price policies considered by Oehmke are reexamined using a simple geometric approach. The analysis suggests that an output subsidy in a small importing economy, an output subsidy in a closed economy, and a target price in a large exporting economy will — on Oehmke's assumptions — cause only small reductions in the internal rate of return from investment in research. This implies that the apparent underinvestment by governments in agricultural research cannot be explained away by a large upward bias, known to governments, in measured rates of return due to failure to account for interactions between research and the costs of price policy measures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages8
JournalAgricultural Economics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Price policy
Costs
Internal rate of return
Interaction
Subsidies
Government
Target price
Underinvestment
Policy measures
Importing
Social returns
Agricultural research
Rate of return
Exporting
Research policy

Cite this

@article{d54a0e4bf9bf4bc9a2ece2cda14760e7,
title = "The calculation of returns to research in distorted markets : comment",
abstract = "In a recent article, Oehmke reported that a high internal rate of return for investment in research when the interaction between research and price policy costs was disregarded could become very low or even negative when the effects of research on the costs of price policy were considered. In this paper, the social returns from research in the presence of the price policies considered by Oehmke are reexamined using a simple geometric approach. The analysis suggests that an output subsidy in a small importing economy, an output subsidy in a closed economy, and a target price in a large exporting economy will — on Oehmke's assumptions — cause only small reductions in the internal rate of return from investment in research. This implies that the apparent underinvestment by governments in agricultural research cannot be explained away by a large upward bias, known to governments, in measured rates of return due to failure to account for interactions between research and the costs of price policy measures.",
author = "VOON, {Jan Piaw, Thomas} and EDWARDS, {Geoff W.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0169-5150(91)90037-L",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "75--82",
journal = "Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0169-5150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The calculation of returns to research in distorted markets : comment. / VOON, Jan Piaw, Thomas; EDWARDS, Geoff W.

In: Agricultural Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 75-82.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The calculation of returns to research in distorted markets : comment

AU - VOON, Jan Piaw, Thomas

AU - EDWARDS, Geoff W.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - In a recent article, Oehmke reported that a high internal rate of return for investment in research when the interaction between research and price policy costs was disregarded could become very low or even negative when the effects of research on the costs of price policy were considered. In this paper, the social returns from research in the presence of the price policies considered by Oehmke are reexamined using a simple geometric approach. The analysis suggests that an output subsidy in a small importing economy, an output subsidy in a closed economy, and a target price in a large exporting economy will — on Oehmke's assumptions — cause only small reductions in the internal rate of return from investment in research. This implies that the apparent underinvestment by governments in agricultural research cannot be explained away by a large upward bias, known to governments, in measured rates of return due to failure to account for interactions between research and the costs of price policy measures.

AB - In a recent article, Oehmke reported that a high internal rate of return for investment in research when the interaction between research and price policy costs was disregarded could become very low or even negative when the effects of research on the costs of price policy were considered. In this paper, the social returns from research in the presence of the price policies considered by Oehmke are reexamined using a simple geometric approach. The analysis suggests that an output subsidy in a small importing economy, an output subsidy in a closed economy, and a target price in a large exporting economy will — on Oehmke's assumptions — cause only small reductions in the internal rate of return from investment in research. This implies that the apparent underinvestment by governments in agricultural research cannot be explained away by a large upward bias, known to governments, in measured rates of return due to failure to account for interactions between research and the costs of price policy measures.

UR - http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/172714/files/agec1991v005i001a005.pdf

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6245

U2 - 10.1016/0169-5150(91)90037-L

DO - 10.1016/0169-5150(91)90037-L

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 5

SP - 75

EP - 82

JO - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

JF - Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

SN - 0169-5150

IS - 1

ER -