Abstract
We study a mechanism designerís trade-off between the complexity level and optimality level of a mechanism. While our techniques apply to a much larger class of mechanism design problems, we restrict our presentation to Mussa and Rosen (1978) quality di§erentiation in which a monopolist restricts itself to o§ering a menu with at most a Önite number n of varieties. We prove that (i) the marginal beneÖt of adding one more variety is diminishing in n; (ii) the loss due to the restriction on the number of varieties is of order no more than 1=n2 ; (iii) the marginal beneÖt of adding one more variety is of order no more than 1=n3 ; and (iv) o§ering only two varieties can make more than two-third of the potential proÖt that can be made by the second best o§ering. Roughly speaking, our analysis predicts that the monopolist should very plausibly o§er only a small number of varieties in the menu
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 7-21 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Mathematical Economics |
| Volume | 54 |
| Early online date | 14 Aug 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Funding
The author is grateful to three anonymous referees and the co-editor for their comments and suggestions.
Keywords
- Mechanism design
- Nonlinear pricing
- Short menu
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The choice of the number of varieties : justifying simple mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver