The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defense of subjective wellbeing

Lufanna C. H. LAI, Robert A. CUMMINS

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies investigate subjective wellbeing (SWB) homeostasis. The first investigates the contribution of job satisfaction (JS) and partner satisfaction (PS) to the homeostatic defense of SWB. The extant model of homeostasis does not include either variable. The second study investigates the relationship between Homeostatically Protected Mood (HPMood) and other factors involved in the homeostatic model. It has been proposed that HPMood is the basic, biologically determined, positive mood that saturates SWB and other related variables, and forms the basis of the SWB set-point. Thus, if HPMood is an individual difference and it perfuses other homeostatic variables, then HPMood should be responsible for much of the shared variance between such variables. Two comparative samples are involved. One is a group of 171 Hong Kong Chinese recruited through convenience sampling. The other is a group of 343 Australians recruited via a general population survey. Results indicate that both JS and PS predict significant variance in Global Life Satisfaction beyond the existing factors in the homeostatic model. It is also found that, after controlling for the effect of HPMood, the strength of correlations between SWB and other homeostatic variables is significantly diminished. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-217
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume111
Issue number1
Early online date13 Jan 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
mood
job satisfaction
Homeostasis
Hong Kong
Individuality
Mood
Subjective Well-being
Group
Population

Keywords

  • Subjective wellbeing
  • Personal Wellbeing Index
  • Homeostatically protected mood
  • Homeostatic model
  • Global life satisfaction
  • Cultural response bias

Cite this

LAI, Lufanna C. H. ; CUMMINS, Robert A. / The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defense of subjective wellbeing. In: Social Indicators Research. 2013 ; Vol. 111, No. 1. pp. 203-217.
@article{439980ad9f494225a65adfa21625b6c7,
title = "The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defense of subjective wellbeing",
abstract = "Two studies investigate subjective wellbeing (SWB) homeostasis. The first investigates the contribution of job satisfaction (JS) and partner satisfaction (PS) to the homeostatic defense of SWB. The extant model of homeostasis does not include either variable. The second study investigates the relationship between Homeostatically Protected Mood (HPMood) and other factors involved in the homeostatic model. It has been proposed that HPMood is the basic, biologically determined, positive mood that saturates SWB and other related variables, and forms the basis of the SWB set-point. Thus, if HPMood is an individual difference and it perfuses other homeostatic variables, then HPMood should be responsible for much of the shared variance between such variables. Two comparative samples are involved. One is a group of 171 Hong Kong Chinese recruited through convenience sampling. The other is a group of 343 Australians recruited via a general population survey. Results indicate that both JS and PS predict significant variance in Global Life Satisfaction beyond the existing factors in the homeostatic model. It is also found that, after controlling for the effect of HPMood, the strength of correlations between SWB and other homeostatic variables is significantly diminished. The implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Subjective wellbeing, Personal Wellbeing Index, Homeostatically protected mood, Homeostatic model, Global life satisfaction, Cultural response bias",
author = "LAI, {Lufanna C. H.} and CUMMINS, {Robert A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11205-011-9991-6",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "203--217",
journal = "Social Indicators Research",
issn = "0303-8300",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defense of subjective wellbeing. / LAI, Lufanna C. H.; CUMMINS, Robert A.

In: Social Indicators Research, Vol. 111, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 203-217.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defense of subjective wellbeing

AU - LAI, Lufanna C. H.

AU - CUMMINS, Robert A.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Two studies investigate subjective wellbeing (SWB) homeostasis. The first investigates the contribution of job satisfaction (JS) and partner satisfaction (PS) to the homeostatic defense of SWB. The extant model of homeostasis does not include either variable. The second study investigates the relationship between Homeostatically Protected Mood (HPMood) and other factors involved in the homeostatic model. It has been proposed that HPMood is the basic, biologically determined, positive mood that saturates SWB and other related variables, and forms the basis of the SWB set-point. Thus, if HPMood is an individual difference and it perfuses other homeostatic variables, then HPMood should be responsible for much of the shared variance between such variables. Two comparative samples are involved. One is a group of 171 Hong Kong Chinese recruited through convenience sampling. The other is a group of 343 Australians recruited via a general population survey. Results indicate that both JS and PS predict significant variance in Global Life Satisfaction beyond the existing factors in the homeostatic model. It is also found that, after controlling for the effect of HPMood, the strength of correlations between SWB and other homeostatic variables is significantly diminished. The implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - Two studies investigate subjective wellbeing (SWB) homeostasis. The first investigates the contribution of job satisfaction (JS) and partner satisfaction (PS) to the homeostatic defense of SWB. The extant model of homeostasis does not include either variable. The second study investigates the relationship between Homeostatically Protected Mood (HPMood) and other factors involved in the homeostatic model. It has been proposed that HPMood is the basic, biologically determined, positive mood that saturates SWB and other related variables, and forms the basis of the SWB set-point. Thus, if HPMood is an individual difference and it perfuses other homeostatic variables, then HPMood should be responsible for much of the shared variance between such variables. Two comparative samples are involved. One is a group of 171 Hong Kong Chinese recruited through convenience sampling. The other is a group of 343 Australians recruited via a general population survey. Results indicate that both JS and PS predict significant variance in Global Life Satisfaction beyond the existing factors in the homeostatic model. It is also found that, after controlling for the effect of HPMood, the strength of correlations between SWB and other homeostatic variables is significantly diminished. The implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Subjective wellbeing

KW - Personal Wellbeing Index

KW - Homeostatically protected mood

KW - Homeostatic model

KW - Global life satisfaction

KW - Cultural response bias

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6630

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84873412620&doi=10.1007%2fs11205-011-9991-6&partnerID=40&md5=93d0d340d2773338c8b2b86ad1a3db67

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-011-9991-6

DO - 10.1007/s11205-011-9991-6

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 111

SP - 203

EP - 217

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

SN - 0303-8300

IS - 1

ER -