The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-national measurement invariance and convergent validity evidence

Veljko JOVANOVIĆ*, Maksim RUDNEV, Mohamed ABDELRAHMAN, Nor Ba'yah ABDUL KADIR, Damilola Fisayo ADEBAYO, Plamen AKALIYSKI, Rana ALASEEL, Yousuf Abdulqader ALKAMALI, Luz Marina ALONSO PALACIO, Azzam AMIN, Andrii ANDRES, Alireza ANSARI-MOGHADDAM, John Jamir ARUTA, Hrant M. AVANESYAN, Norzihan AYUB, Maria BACIKOVA-SLESKOVA, Raushan BAIKANOVA, Batoul BAKKAR, Sunčica BARTOLUCI, David BENITEZIvanna BODNAR, Aidos BOLATOV, Judyta BORCHET, Ksenija BOSNAR, Yunier BROCHE-PÉREZ, Carmen BUZEA, Rosalinda CASSIBBA, Maria DEL PILAR GRAZIOSO, Sandesh DHAKAL, Radosveta DIMITROVA, Alejandra DOMINGUEZ, Cong Doanh DUONG, Luciana DUTRA THOME, Arune Joao ESTAVELA, Emmanuel Abiodun FAYANKINNU, Nelli FERENCZI, Regina FERNÁNDEZ-MORALES, Maria-Therese FRIEHS, Jorge GAETE, Wassim GHARZ EDINE, Shahar GINDI, Rubia Carla GIORDANI, Biljana GJONESKA, Juan Carlos GODOY, Camellia Doncheva HANCHEVA, Given HAPUNDA, Shogo HIHARA, Md. Saiful ISLAM, Anna JANOVSKÁ, Nino JAVAKHISHVILI, Russell Sarwar KABIR, Amir KABUNGA, Arzu KARAKULAK, Johannes Alfons KARL, Darko KATOVIĆ, Zhumaly KAUYZBAY, Maria KAŹMIERCZAK, Richa KHANNA, Meetu KHOSLA, Peter KISAAKYE, Martina KLICPEROVA-BAKER, Richman KOKERA, Ana KOZINA, Steven E. KRAUSS, Rodrigo LANDABUR, Katharina LEFRINGHAUSEN, Aleksandra LEWANDOWSKA-WALTER, Yun-Hsia LIANG, Danny LIZARZABURU-AGUINAGA, Lorena Cecilia LÓPEZ STEINMETZ, Ana MAKASHVILI, Sadia MALIK, Denisse MANRIQUE-MILLONES, Marta MARTÍN-CARBONELL, Maria Angela MATTAR YUNES, Breeda MCGRATH, Enkeleint A. MECHILI, Marinés MEJÍA ALVAREZ, Samson MHIZHA, Justyna MICHAŁEK-KWIECIEŃ, Sushanta Kumar MISHRA, Mahdi MOHAMMADI, Fatema MOHSEN, Rodrigo MORETA-HERRERA, Maria D. MURADYAN, Pasquale MUSSO, Andrej NATERER, Arash NEMAT, Félix NETO, Joana NETO, Hassan OKATI-ALIABAD, Carlos Iván ORELLANA, Ligia ORELLANA, Joonha PARK, Iuliia PAVLOVA, Eddy Alfonso PERALTA, Petro PETRYTSA, Rasa PILKAUSKAITE VALICKIENE, Saša PIŠOT, Iva POLÁČKOVÁ ŠOLCOVÁ, Franjo PROT, Gordana RISTEVSKA DIMITROVSKA, Rita M. RIVERA, Benedicta Prihatin Dwi RIYANTI, Mohd Saiful Husain SAIFUL, Adil SAMEKIN, Telman SEISEMBEKOV, Danielius SERAPINAS, Zahra SHARAFI, Prerna SHARMA, Shanu SHUKLA, Fabiola SILLETTI, Katarzyna SKRZYPIŃSKA, Vanessa SMITH-CASTRO, Olga SOLOMONTOS-KOUNTOURI, Adrian STANCIU, Delia ŞTEFENEL, Maria STOFIANNI, Jaimee STUART, Mst Sadia SULTANA, Dijana SULEJMANOVIĆ, Angela Oktavia SURYANI, Ergyul TAIR, Lucy TAVITIAN-ELMADJIAN, Fitim UKA, Guilherme Welter WENDT, Pei-Jung YANG, Ebrar YILDIRIM, Yue YU

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) is a widely used measure that captures somatic symptoms of coronavirus-related anxiety. In a large-scale collaboration spanning 60 countries ( N total = 21,513), we examined the CAS's measurement invariance and assessed the convergent validity of CAS scores in relation to the fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) and the satisfaction with life (SWLS-3) scales. We utilized both conventional exact invariance tests and alignment procedures, with results revealing that the single-factor model fit the data well in almost all countries. Partial scalar invariance was supported in a subset of 56 countries. To ensure the robustness of results, given the unbalanced samples, we employed resampling techniques both with and without replacement and found the results were more stable in larger samples. The alignment procedure demonstrated a high degree of measurement invariance with 9% of the parameters exhibiting noninvariance. We also conducted simulations of alignment using the parameters estimated in the current model. Findings demonstrated reliability of the means but indicated challenges in estimating the latent variances. Strong positive correlations between CAS and FCV-19S estimated with all three different approaches were found in most countries. Correlations of CAS and SWLS-3 were weak and negative but significantly differed from zero in several countries. Overall, the study provided support for the measurement invariance of the CAS and offered evidence of its convergent validity while also highlighting issues with variance estimation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-29
Number of pages16
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date27 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Psychological Association

Funding

The work of Marta Martín-Carbonell was supported by the Cooperative University of Colombia, Grant INV3092. The work of Jorge Gaete was supported by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo—Millennium Science Initiative Program, Grant NCS2021_081. The work of Adrian Stanciu was supported by GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. The work of Shanu Shukla, Martina Klicperova-Baker, and Iva Poláčková Šolcová was supported by Národní plán obnovy (NPO) “Systemic Risk Institute,” Grant LX22NPO5101, funded by the European Union—Next Generation European Union (Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports, NPO: EXCELES). The work of Hrant M. Avanesyan was supported by the financial support of the RA Science Committee, Project 21T-5A203. The work of Breeda McGrath was supported by American Psychological Association Division 48, Small Grants Program. The work of Judyta Borchet was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science, Scholarship START 006.2022. The work of Rubia Carla Formighieri Giordani was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico/CNPq), Project 401749/2022-3. The authors have no known conflicts of interest to disclose.

Keywords

  • coronavirus anxiety
  • measurement invariance
  • alignment
  • validity
  • culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-national measurement invariance and convergent validity evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this