Abstract
This interdisciplinary paper, informed by research and practices in neo-institutional economics, property law and land surveying, is an exploratory account of the boundary as (a) the ontological foundation of private property in land and boundary dispute resolution, and (b) as a pre-contractual condition of any Coasian exchange of rights for planned urban development and space-relevant innovations. Under conditions of positive transaction costs according to the third Coase Theorem, with the help of real-life examples, the paper explains the choice of using the courts, instead of the market, as a means of resolving disputes over land boundaries. It does so in terms of two land surveying and three economic reasons. The surveying reasons are historical and cartographical. The economics reasons relate to the price level of land, the transaction costs of enforcing dispute resolutions and the externalities of land boundary determination.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 579-599 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Annals of Regional Science |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, Springer.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The determination of the “true” property boundary in planned development : a Coasian analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver