The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision-making : an experiment in China

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an experiment with 80 participants in China, protagonists with opposing views in organizations that valued collectivism, compared to individualism, were found to develop cooperative goals, were confident that they could work, sought to understand, and demonstrated that they understood the opposing arguments, accepted these arguments as reasonable, and combined positions to create an integrated decision. The inductions comparing participants who valued harmony as a goal or a technique in which they pretended to agree were only partially effective and did not yield significant differences on conflict dynamics and outcomes. Findings challenge traditional theorizing that collectivistic values lead to conflict avoidance, and support recent arguments that strong, cooperative relationships promote the productive discussion of opposing views in decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2904-2926
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

China
Decision Making
Conflict (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{bd33056b28ab4e5f940e59e38b7e781c,
title = "The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision-making : an experiment in China",
abstract = "In an experiment with 80 participants in China, protagonists with opposing views in organizations that valued collectivism, compared to individualism, were found to develop cooperative goals, were confident that they could work, sought to understand, and demonstrated that they understood the opposing arguments, accepted these arguments as reasonable, and combined positions to create an integrated decision. The inductions comparing participants who valued harmony as a goal or a technique in which they pretended to agree were only partially effective and did not yield significant differences on conflict dynamics and outcomes. Findings challenge traditional theorizing that collectivistic values lead to conflict avoidance, and support recent arguments that strong, cooperative relationships promote the productive discussion of opposing views in decision making.",
author = "Dean TJOSVOLD and Peiguan WU and CHEN, {Yifeng, Nancy}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00686.x",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "2904--2926",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision-making : an experiment in China. / TJOSVOLD, Dean; WU, Peiguan; CHEN, Yifeng, Nancy.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 11, 01.11.2010, p. 2904-2926.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision-making : an experiment in China

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean

AU - WU, Peiguan

AU - CHEN, Yifeng, Nancy

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - In an experiment with 80 participants in China, protagonists with opposing views in organizations that valued collectivism, compared to individualism, were found to develop cooperative goals, were confident that they could work, sought to understand, and demonstrated that they understood the opposing arguments, accepted these arguments as reasonable, and combined positions to create an integrated decision. The inductions comparing participants who valued harmony as a goal or a technique in which they pretended to agree were only partially effective and did not yield significant differences on conflict dynamics and outcomes. Findings challenge traditional theorizing that collectivistic values lead to conflict avoidance, and support recent arguments that strong, cooperative relationships promote the productive discussion of opposing views in decision making.

AB - In an experiment with 80 participants in China, protagonists with opposing views in organizations that valued collectivism, compared to individualism, were found to develop cooperative goals, were confident that they could work, sought to understand, and demonstrated that they understood the opposing arguments, accepted these arguments as reasonable, and combined positions to create an integrated decision. The inductions comparing participants who valued harmony as a goal or a technique in which they pretended to agree were only partially effective and did not yield significant differences on conflict dynamics and outcomes. Findings challenge traditional theorizing that collectivistic values lead to conflict avoidance, and support recent arguments that strong, cooperative relationships promote the productive discussion of opposing views in decision making.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/579

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00686.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00686.x

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 40

SP - 2904

EP - 2926

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 11

ER -