Abstract
Abstract: The expectancy-disconfirmation model has become the predominant approach in explaining citizen satisfaction with public services. It posits that citizens compare the performance of a service against their expectations of that service. Satisfaction occurs if the perceived performance meets or exceeds the expectations. We provide the first meta-analysis of the empirical evidence on this relationship, and find that the model is supported across studies. However, our meta-analysis also indicates that research design choices affect the results and that the scope of public services examined is not comprehensive. We make best practice recommendations for future research to improve the measurement of citizen satisfaction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 147-159 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Public Administration Review |
Volume | 82 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 12 Jan 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Authors. Public Administration Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The American Society for Public Administration
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, Korean Government (NRF-2017S1A3A2067636).