The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Which metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong. I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.e., the thesis that we are animals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-204
Number of pages6
JournalBioethics
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

universalism
Contraception
contraception
abortion
animal
Animalism
Universalism
Supporters

Cite this

@article{40a1e396141947c6ba31b27f8e10f612,
title = "The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism",
abstract = "Which metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong. I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.e., the thesis that we are animals.",
author = "Andrea SAUCHELLI",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bioe.12417",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "199--204",
journal = "Bioethics",
issn = "0269-9702",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism. / SAUCHELLI, Andrea.

In: Bioethics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 199-204.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism

AU - SAUCHELLI, Andrea

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Which metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong. I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.e., the thesis that we are animals.

AB - Which metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong. I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.e., the thesis that we are animals.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7154

U2 - 10.1111/bioe.12417

DO - 10.1111/bioe.12417

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 32

SP - 199

EP - 204

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

IS - 3

ER -