The grammar of prudence : Arendt, Jaspers, and the appraisal of Max Weber

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the exchange between Jaspers and Arendt over a problem — condensed in the name of Max Weber — that had first emerged specifically in their correspondence as early as January 1933 and that retained its salience until roughly three years before Jaspers's death in 1969. It suggests that few authors of the twentieth century offered a more comprehensive alternative to Weber's political and sociological thought than Arendt did. It begins by examining how Jaspers summoned Weber's name to delineate a certain idea of Germanness and how Arendt responded to Jaspers's attempts to encompass her within this idea. It shows that she was much more forthright in rejecting Jaspers's interpretation of Germany than she was in confronting his view of Max Weber, and this also has to be explained. The chapter then answers a couple of related hermeneutical questions. If Arendt and Weber were so markedly at variance as theorists, why did this not emerge in the Arendt–Jaspers correspondence, where Weber's name is so often invoked? And how did Hannah Arendt respond to Jaspers on the Weber question in a way that minimized conflict between her and her erstwhile supervisor? Answering this latter question illustrates some of the major axes of difference that typify Arendt's and Weber's approaches to political and sociological questions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHannah Arendt in Jerusalem
PublisherUniversity of California Press
Pages306-324
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9780520220577
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2001

Fingerprint

Grammar
Prudence
Max Weber
Names
Theorists
Germany
Supervisors
Thought
Hannah Arendt

Keywords

  • Germanness
  • Germany
  • Hannah Arendt
  • Karl Jaspers
  • Max Weber

Cite this

BAEHR, William Peter. / The grammar of prudence : Arendt, Jaspers, and the appraisal of Max Weber. Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. University of California Press, 2001. pp. 306-324
@inbook{93c5196c61ac4d23b019a4761984e04c,
title = "The grammar of prudence : Arendt, Jaspers, and the appraisal of Max Weber",
abstract = "This chapter focuses on the exchange between Jaspers and Arendt over a problem — condensed in the name of Max Weber — that had first emerged specifically in their correspondence as early as January 1933 and that retained its salience until roughly three years before Jaspers's death in 1969. It suggests that few authors of the twentieth century offered a more comprehensive alternative to Weber's political and sociological thought than Arendt did. It begins by examining how Jaspers summoned Weber's name to delineate a certain idea of Germanness and how Arendt responded to Jaspers's attempts to encompass her within this idea. It shows that she was much more forthright in rejecting Jaspers's interpretation of Germany than she was in confronting his view of Max Weber, and this also has to be explained. The chapter then answers a couple of related hermeneutical questions. If Arendt and Weber were so markedly at variance as theorists, why did this not emerge in the Arendt–Jaspers correspondence, where Weber's name is so often invoked? And how did Hannah Arendt respond to Jaspers on the Weber question in a way that minimized conflict between her and her erstwhile supervisor? Answering this latter question illustrates some of the major axes of difference that typify Arendt's and Weber's approaches to political and sociological questions.",
keywords = "Germanness, Germany, Hannah Arendt, Karl Jaspers, Max Weber",
author = "BAEHR, {William Peter}",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/california/9780520220560.003.0020",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780520220577",
pages = "306--324",
booktitle = "Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem",
publisher = "University of California Press",
address = "United States",

}

The grammar of prudence : Arendt, Jaspers, and the appraisal of Max Weber. / BAEHR, William Peter.

Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem. University of California Press, 2001. p. 306-324.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The grammar of prudence : Arendt, Jaspers, and the appraisal of Max Weber

AU - BAEHR, William Peter

PY - 2001/8/1

Y1 - 2001/8/1

N2 - This chapter focuses on the exchange between Jaspers and Arendt over a problem — condensed in the name of Max Weber — that had first emerged specifically in their correspondence as early as January 1933 and that retained its salience until roughly three years before Jaspers's death in 1969. It suggests that few authors of the twentieth century offered a more comprehensive alternative to Weber's political and sociological thought than Arendt did. It begins by examining how Jaspers summoned Weber's name to delineate a certain idea of Germanness and how Arendt responded to Jaspers's attempts to encompass her within this idea. It shows that she was much more forthright in rejecting Jaspers's interpretation of Germany than she was in confronting his view of Max Weber, and this also has to be explained. The chapter then answers a couple of related hermeneutical questions. If Arendt and Weber were so markedly at variance as theorists, why did this not emerge in the Arendt–Jaspers correspondence, where Weber's name is so often invoked? And how did Hannah Arendt respond to Jaspers on the Weber question in a way that minimized conflict between her and her erstwhile supervisor? Answering this latter question illustrates some of the major axes of difference that typify Arendt's and Weber's approaches to political and sociological questions.

AB - This chapter focuses on the exchange between Jaspers and Arendt over a problem — condensed in the name of Max Weber — that had first emerged specifically in their correspondence as early as January 1933 and that retained its salience until roughly three years before Jaspers's death in 1969. It suggests that few authors of the twentieth century offered a more comprehensive alternative to Weber's political and sociological thought than Arendt did. It begins by examining how Jaspers summoned Weber's name to delineate a certain idea of Germanness and how Arendt responded to Jaspers's attempts to encompass her within this idea. It shows that she was much more forthright in rejecting Jaspers's interpretation of Germany than she was in confronting his view of Max Weber, and this also has to be explained. The chapter then answers a couple of related hermeneutical questions. If Arendt and Weber were so markedly at variance as theorists, why did this not emerge in the Arendt–Jaspers correspondence, where Weber's name is so often invoked? And how did Hannah Arendt respond to Jaspers on the Weber question in a way that minimized conflict between her and her erstwhile supervisor? Answering this latter question illustrates some of the major axes of difference that typify Arendt's and Weber's approaches to political and sociological questions.

KW - Germanness

KW - Germany

KW - Hannah Arendt

KW - Karl Jaspers

KW - Max Weber

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5586

U2 - 10.1525/california/9780520220560.003.0020

DO - 10.1525/california/9780520220560.003.0020

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780520220577

SP - 306

EP - 324

BT - Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem

PB - University of California Press

ER -