The housing boom and the rise of localism in Hong Kong : Evidence from the legislative Council Election in 2016

Stan Hok-Wui WONG, Kin Man WAN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Localist parties have become an emerging force in Hong Kong's political landscape. What has caused the rise of localism in the city? Extant studies focus on cultural and social factors. In this article, we propose a political economy explanation: global and regional economic factors have caused a housing boom in Hong Kong since the mid-2000s and produced impactful redistributive consequences. While homeowners benefit tremendously from the hike in asset prices, non-homeowners stand to lose. Their divergent economic interests then translate into political preferences; homeowners support political parties that favour the status quo, while non-homeowners tend to support those that challenge it. Using a newly available public opinion survey, we find preliminary evidence in support of our argument. In particular, homeowners are less likely to identify with localist parties and tend to vote for pro-establishment ones. High-income earners, however, are more likely to vote for localist parties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-40
Number of pages10
JournalChina Perspectives
Volume2018
Issue number3
Early online date1 Sept 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

The data used in this article come from the Hong Kong Election Study (HKES), a research project generously funded by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (GRF Ref. No.: 14615915).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Francais sur la Chine Contemporaine China.

Keywords

  • Home ownership
  • Hong Kong elections
  • Localism
  • Political identification
  • Vote choice
  • Wealth inequality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The housing boom and the rise of localism in Hong Kong : Evidence from the legislative Council Election in 2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this