The impact of domestic regulations on international trade in services : evidence from firm-level data

Matthieu Daniel CROZET, Emmanuel MILET, Daniel MIRZA

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to promote international trade in services, most bilateral and multilateral trade agreements aim at eliminating the discriminatory barriers. However, domestic regulations, which apply to all firms alike and do not intend to exclude foreign sellers, are often seen as serious obstacles to cross-border trade in services. This paper proposes an assessment of the impact of these regulations on international trade of professional services. Our empirical analysis combines OECD measures of domestic regulation and detailed French data on firm-level bilateral export of professional services. Results show a robust and a sizeable negative impact of domestic regulations on both the decision to export and the values exported by each firm. This impact does not vary with firms’ productivity, and remains significant when we focus on the European Union market, where French exporters do not face discriminatory barriers. We conduct a quantification exercise based on our estimates and find an average ad-valorem tariff equivalent of domestic regulations of 60% in 2007. The ad-valorem tariff equivalent ranges from 26% to 88%, depending on the country.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-607
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Comparative Economics
Volume44
Issue number3
Early online date2 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Firm-level data
International trade
Trade in services
Tariffs
Professional services
Bilateral
Empirical analysis
Firm productivity
Cross-border trade
European Union
Exercise
Trade agreements
Quantification
Exporters
Seller

Bibliographical note

This paper was produced as part of the European Firms in a Global Economy: Internal policies for external competitiveness (EFIGE) project, a collaborative project funded by the European Commission Seventh Research Framework Programme, Contract # 225551. It has also benefited from funding from the Banque de France.

Keywords

  • Firm-level exports
  • GATS
  • Trade barriers
  • Trade in services

Cite this

@article{bd1d8335c7be43db8de3435f60e70a2c,
title = "The impact of domestic regulations on international trade in services : evidence from firm-level data",
abstract = "In order to promote international trade in services, most bilateral and multilateral trade agreements aim at eliminating the discriminatory barriers. However, domestic regulations, which apply to all firms alike and do not intend to exclude foreign sellers, are often seen as serious obstacles to cross-border trade in services. This paper proposes an assessment of the impact of these regulations on international trade of professional services. Our empirical analysis combines OECD measures of domestic regulation and detailed French data on firm-level bilateral export of professional services. Results show a robust and a sizeable negative impact of domestic regulations on both the decision to export and the values exported by each firm. This impact does not vary with firms’ productivity, and remains significant when we focus on the European Union market, where French exporters do not face discriminatory barriers. We conduct a quantification exercise based on our estimates and find an average ad-valorem tariff equivalent of domestic regulations of 60{\%} in 2007. The ad-valorem tariff equivalent ranges from 26{\%} to 88{\%}, depending on the country.",
keywords = "Firm-level exports, GATS, Trade barriers, Trade in services",
author = "CROZET, {Matthieu Daniel} and Emmanuel MILET and Daniel MIRZA",
note = "This paper was produced as part of the European Firms in a Global Economy: Internal policies for external competitiveness (EFIGE) project, a collaborative project funded by the European Commission Seventh Research Framework Programme, Contract # 225551. It has also benefited from funding from the Banque de France.",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jce.2015.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "585--607",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Economics",
issn = "0147-5967",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

The impact of domestic regulations on international trade in services : evidence from firm-level data. / CROZET, Matthieu Daniel; MILET, Emmanuel; MIRZA, Daniel.

In: Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 44, No. 3, 08.2016, p. 585-607.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of domestic regulations on international trade in services : evidence from firm-level data

AU - CROZET, Matthieu Daniel

AU - MILET, Emmanuel

AU - MIRZA, Daniel

N1 - This paper was produced as part of the European Firms in a Global Economy: Internal policies for external competitiveness (EFIGE) project, a collaborative project funded by the European Commission Seventh Research Framework Programme, Contract # 225551. It has also benefited from funding from the Banque de France.

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - In order to promote international trade in services, most bilateral and multilateral trade agreements aim at eliminating the discriminatory barriers. However, domestic regulations, which apply to all firms alike and do not intend to exclude foreign sellers, are often seen as serious obstacles to cross-border trade in services. This paper proposes an assessment of the impact of these regulations on international trade of professional services. Our empirical analysis combines OECD measures of domestic regulation and detailed French data on firm-level bilateral export of professional services. Results show a robust and a sizeable negative impact of domestic regulations on both the decision to export and the values exported by each firm. This impact does not vary with firms’ productivity, and remains significant when we focus on the European Union market, where French exporters do not face discriminatory barriers. We conduct a quantification exercise based on our estimates and find an average ad-valorem tariff equivalent of domestic regulations of 60% in 2007. The ad-valorem tariff equivalent ranges from 26% to 88%, depending on the country.

AB - In order to promote international trade in services, most bilateral and multilateral trade agreements aim at eliminating the discriminatory barriers. However, domestic regulations, which apply to all firms alike and do not intend to exclude foreign sellers, are often seen as serious obstacles to cross-border trade in services. This paper proposes an assessment of the impact of these regulations on international trade of professional services. Our empirical analysis combines OECD measures of domestic regulation and detailed French data on firm-level bilateral export of professional services. Results show a robust and a sizeable negative impact of domestic regulations on both the decision to export and the values exported by each firm. This impact does not vary with firms’ productivity, and remains significant when we focus on the European Union market, where French exporters do not face discriminatory barriers. We conduct a quantification exercise based on our estimates and find an average ad-valorem tariff equivalent of domestic regulations of 60% in 2007. The ad-valorem tariff equivalent ranges from 26% to 88%, depending on the country.

KW - Firm-level exports

KW - GATS

KW - Trade barriers

KW - Trade in services

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5962

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959520474&doi=10.1016%2fj.jce.2015.11.004&partnerID=40&md5=a9fd3c0f125686f037d586b2ac0606ef

U2 - 10.1016/j.jce.2015.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jce.2015.11.004

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 44

SP - 585

EP - 607

JO - Journal of Comparative Economics

JF - Journal of Comparative Economics

SN - 0147-5967

IS - 3

ER -