The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges : an empirical study

Michael K. FUNG, Kwok Hon, Leonard CHENG, Larry D. QIU

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Before the introduction of terminal handling charges (THCs), traditional freight rates included both ocean freight charges and terminal charges at ports. Since the introduction of THCs in 1991, the freight rate has become a “port-to-port” charge that covers only the sea leg, while the on-shore costs of using the container terminals are charged separately as THCs. Although both THCs and freight rates are collectively set by conferences, in this study we argue that the former are easier to enforce because they are invariant to other attributes such as haulage distance, inland transport services and types of commodity being shipped. This argument is consistent with the empirical findings from this study that suggest the separation of ocean freight rates from terminal charges has increased the overall shipping charges. In addition, we find that THCs affect the Hong Kong container handling industry by lowering its throughput.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-716
Number of pages14
JournalTransportation research PART a-policy and practice
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

shipping
Freight transportation
Containers
commodity
Hong Kong
industry
costs
Throughput
Costs
Industry
Empirical study
Shipping
Charge
Freight rates

Keywords

  • Port
  • Shipping
  • Terminal handling charges
  • Transportation

Cite this

@article{267846c918a947cabe074beadd6974f5,
title = "The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges : an empirical study",
abstract = "Before the introduction of terminal handling charges (THCs), traditional freight rates included both ocean freight charges and terminal charges at ports. Since the introduction of THCs in 1991, the freight rate has become a “port-to-port” charge that covers only the sea leg, while the on-shore costs of using the container terminals are charged separately as THCs. Although both THCs and freight rates are collectively set by conferences, in this study we argue that the former are easier to enforce because they are invariant to other attributes such as haulage distance, inland transport services and types of commodity being shipped. This argument is consistent with the empirical findings from this study that suggest the separation of ocean freight rates from terminal charges has increased the overall shipping charges. In addition, we find that THCs affect the Hong Kong container handling industry by lowering its throughput.",
keywords = "Port, Shipping, Terminal handling charges, Transportation",
author = "FUNG, {Michael K.} and CHENG, {Kwok Hon, Leonard} and QIU, {Larry D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00026-0",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "703--716",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "8",

}

The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges : an empirical study. / FUNG, Michael K.; CHENG, Kwok Hon, Leonard; QIU, Larry D.

In: Transportation research PART a-policy and practice, Vol. 37, No. 8, 01.10.2003, p. 703-716.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges : an empirical study

AU - FUNG, Michael K.

AU - CHENG, Kwok Hon, Leonard

AU - QIU, Larry D.

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - Before the introduction of terminal handling charges (THCs), traditional freight rates included both ocean freight charges and terminal charges at ports. Since the introduction of THCs in 1991, the freight rate has become a “port-to-port” charge that covers only the sea leg, while the on-shore costs of using the container terminals are charged separately as THCs. Although both THCs and freight rates are collectively set by conferences, in this study we argue that the former are easier to enforce because they are invariant to other attributes such as haulage distance, inland transport services and types of commodity being shipped. This argument is consistent with the empirical findings from this study that suggest the separation of ocean freight rates from terminal charges has increased the overall shipping charges. In addition, we find that THCs affect the Hong Kong container handling industry by lowering its throughput.

AB - Before the introduction of terminal handling charges (THCs), traditional freight rates included both ocean freight charges and terminal charges at ports. Since the introduction of THCs in 1991, the freight rate has become a “port-to-port” charge that covers only the sea leg, while the on-shore costs of using the container terminals are charged separately as THCs. Although both THCs and freight rates are collectively set by conferences, in this study we argue that the former are easier to enforce because they are invariant to other attributes such as haulage distance, inland transport services and types of commodity being shipped. This argument is consistent with the empirical findings from this study that suggest the separation of ocean freight rates from terminal charges has increased the overall shipping charges. In addition, we find that THCs affect the Hong Kong container handling industry by lowering its throughput.

KW - Port

KW - Shipping

KW - Terminal handling charges

KW - Transportation

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1523

U2 - 10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00026-0

DO - 10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00026-0

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 37

SP - 703

EP - 716

JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

SN - 0965-8564

IS - 8

ER -