Projects per year
Abstract
Roughly, instrumentalism is the view that science is primarily, and should primarily be, an instrument for furthering our practical ends. It has fallen out of favour because historically influential variants of the view, such as logical positivism, suffered from serious defects.
In this book, however, Darrell P. Rowbottom develops a new form of instrumentalism, which is more sophisticated and resilient than its predecessors. This position—‘cognitive instrumentalism’—involves three core theses. First, science makes theoretical progress primarily when it furnishes us with more predictive power or understanding concerning observable things. Second, scientific discourse concerning unobservable things should only be taken literally in so far as it involves observable properties or analogies with observable things. Third, scientific claims about unobservable things are probably neither approximately true nor liable to change in such a way as to increase in truthlikeness.
There are examples from science throughout the book, and Rowbottom demonstrates at length how cognitive instrumentalism fits with the development of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century chemistry and physics, and especially atomic theory. Drawing upon this history, Rowbottom also argues that there is a kind of understanding, empirical understanding, which we can achieve without having true, or even approximately true, representations of unobservable things. In closing the book, he sets forth his view on how the distinction between the observable and unobservable may be drawn, and compares cognitive instrumentalism with key contemporary alternatives such as structural realism, constructive empiricism, and semirealism.
Overall, this book offers a strong defence of instrumentalism that will be of interest to scholars and students working on the debate about realism in philosophy of science.
In this book, however, Darrell P. Rowbottom develops a new form of instrumentalism, which is more sophisticated and resilient than its predecessors. This position—‘cognitive instrumentalism’—involves three core theses. First, science makes theoretical progress primarily when it furnishes us with more predictive power or understanding concerning observable things. Second, scientific discourse concerning unobservable things should only be taken literally in so far as it involves observable properties or analogies with observable things. Third, scientific claims about unobservable things are probably neither approximately true nor liable to change in such a way as to increase in truthlikeness.
There are examples from science throughout the book, and Rowbottom demonstrates at length how cognitive instrumentalism fits with the development of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century chemistry and physics, and especially atomic theory. Drawing upon this history, Rowbottom also argues that there is a kind of understanding, empirical understanding, which we can achieve without having true, or even approximately true, representations of unobservable things. In closing the book, he sets forth his view on how the distinction between the observable and unobservable may be drawn, and compares cognitive instrumentalism with key contemporary alternatives such as structural realism, constructive empiricism, and semirealism.
Overall, this book offers a strong defence of instrumentalism that will be of interest to scholars and students working on the debate about realism in philosophy of science.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Number of pages | 215 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780429666292 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780367077457, 9781032093475 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18 Mar 2019 |
Publication series
Name | Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science |
---|
Bibliographical note
My work on this book was supported by a Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship from Hong Kong’s Research Grants Council, and by a Senior International Research Fellowship from Durham University’s Institute of Advanced Study (in conjunction with the European Union via the COFUND scheme). Both grants were appropriately named ‘The Instrument of Science’.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The instrument of science : scientific anti-realism revitalised'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 2 Finished
-
-
The Instrument of Science
ROWBOTTOM, D. P. (PI)
Research Grants Council (HKSAR)
1/09/14 → 31/08/15
Project: Grant Research
Prizes
-
RGC Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship Scheme (HSSPFS) Award 2013
ROWBOTTOM, D. P. (Recipient), Nov 2013
Prize: Prize (CDCF)
-
The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-Realism Revitalised by Darrell Rowbottom: Reply by the Author
ROWBOTTOM, D. P., Apr 2023, In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 98, p. 9-11 3 p.Research output: Journal Publications › Comment / Debate › Communication
-
A Methodological Argument Against Scientific Realism
ROWBOTTOM, D. P., Mar 2021, In: Synthese. 198, 3, p. 2153-2167 15 p.Research output: Journal Publications › Journal Article (refereed) › peer-review
1 Citation (Scopus) -
Extending the argument from unconceived alternatives : observations, models, predictions, explanations, methods, instruments, experiments, and values
ROWBOTTOM, D. P., Oct 2019, In: Synthese. 196, 10, p. 3947-3959 13 p.Research output: Journal Publications › Journal Article (refereed) › peer-review
17 Citations (Scopus)