The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-Realism Revitalised by Darrell Rowbottom: Reply by the Author

Darrell P. ROWBOTTOM*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsComment / Debate Communication

Abstract

I am grateful to Aleta Quinn for proposing and organising this forum. I am also thankful to the commentators for reading The Instrument of Science so scrupulously. I will focus mainly on their criticisms, organised by topic, in the hope of moving the debate forward. Alas, the word limit prevents me from engaging with each comment I should like to.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-11
Number of pages3
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume98
Early online date16 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

My work on this paper was fully supported by a Senior Research Fellowship award from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China (‘Philosophy of Contemporary and Future Science’, Project no. SRFS2122-3H01).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-Realism Revitalised by Darrell Rowbottom: Reply by the Author'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this