Abstract
I am grateful to Aleta Quinn for proposing and organising this forum. I am also thankful to the commentators for reading The Instrument of Science so scrupulously. I will focus mainly on their criticisms, organised by topic, in the hope of moving the debate forward. Alas, the word limit prevents me from engaging with each comment I should like to.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9-11 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 98 |
| Early online date | 16 Feb 2023 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
My work on this paper was fully supported by a Senior Research Fellowship award from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China (‘Philosophy of Contemporary and Future Science’, Project no. SRFS2122-3H01).Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-Realism Revitalised by Darrell Rowbottom: Reply by the Author'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
Philosophy of Contemporary and Future Science
ROWBOTTOM, D. P. (PI)
Research Grants Council (Hong Kong, China)
1/01/22 → 30/06/27
Project: Grant Research
Research output
- 1 Book (Author)
-
The instrument of science : scientific anti-realism revitalised
ROWBOTTOM, D. P., 18 Mar 2019, Taylor & Francis. 215 p. (Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science)Research output: Scholarly Books | Reports | Literary Works › Book (Author) › peer-review
62 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver