The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns

Alan Lap Fai LEE, Chu Ning ANN, Gerrit W. MAUS

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsAbstract

Abstract

Both the local and global stages of motion processing are susceptible to noise in the stimulus. Given the hierarchical nature of motion processing, how do the effects of local and global noise interact with each other? If such interaction exists, does it differ across different types of motion patterns? We addressed these questions using a novel psychophysical technique, in which uncertainty at the global and local stages of motion processing was independently manipulated within the same motion stimulus. We used a multiple-aperture motion pattern, which consisted of an array of randomly-oriented, drifting-Gabor elements (Amano et al., 2009). Global noise was manipulated based on motion coherence: Global signal-to-noise ratio (global-SNR) was defined as the ratio between signal and noise element numbers. Signal elements were assigned velocities consistent with a specific global motion direction, while noise elements were assigned velocities based on random global motion directions. Local noise was introduced by superimposing dynamic-noise pixels on each drifting Gabor patch at every motion frame. Local-SNR was defined as the ratio between the contrasts of Gabor patches and noise pixels. Observers performed a 2-choice, global-direction-judgment task on three optic-flow patterns: translational (left vs right), circular (clockwise vs counterclockwise), and radial (inward vs outward). In each block of trials, we fixed local-SNR and measured the 75%-accuracy threshold in terms of global-SNR. For all three optic-flow patterns, we found a "tradeoff" between local and global noise: Global-SNR thresholds decreased log-linearly as local-SNR increased, suggesting an interaction between local and global noise in the motion system. Above a certain local-SNR level, global-SNR thresholds remained constant. This saturation point was lower for circular motion compared to radial and translational optic-flow patterns, suggesting that global integration mechanisms for circular motion are more tolerant to disturbances from local noise.
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016
Externally publishedYes
EventVision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting - TradeWinds Island Resorts, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States
Duration: 13 May 201618 May 2016

Conference

ConferenceVision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting
CountryUnited States
CitySt. Pete Beach, Florida
Period13/05/1618/05/16

Fingerprint

Flow patterns
Optics
Signal to noise ratio
Processing
Pixels
Uncertainty

Bibliographical note

Journal of Vision, Vol.16, No.12, Abstract Issue 2016.

Cite this

LEE, A. L. F., ANN, C. N., & MAUS, G. W. (2016). The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns. Abstract from Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.398
LEE, Alan Lap Fai ; ANN, Chu Ning ; MAUS, Gerrit W. / The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns. Abstract from Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States.
@conference{ca161e06c21b4c92add6ccaa2f8e59cf,
title = "The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns",
abstract = "Both the local and global stages of motion processing are susceptible to noise in the stimulus. Given the hierarchical nature of motion processing, how do the effects of local and global noise interact with each other? If such interaction exists, does it differ across different types of motion patterns? We addressed these questions using a novel psychophysical technique, in which uncertainty at the global and local stages of motion processing was independently manipulated within the same motion stimulus. We used a multiple-aperture motion pattern, which consisted of an array of randomly-oriented, drifting-Gabor elements (Amano et al., 2009). Global noise was manipulated based on motion coherence: Global signal-to-noise ratio (global-SNR) was defined as the ratio between signal and noise element numbers. Signal elements were assigned velocities consistent with a specific global motion direction, while noise elements were assigned velocities based on random global motion directions. Local noise was introduced by superimposing dynamic-noise pixels on each drifting Gabor patch at every motion frame. Local-SNR was defined as the ratio between the contrasts of Gabor patches and noise pixels. Observers performed a 2-choice, global-direction-judgment task on three optic-flow patterns: translational (left vs right), circular (clockwise vs counterclockwise), and radial (inward vs outward). In each block of trials, we fixed local-SNR and measured the 75{\%}-accuracy threshold in terms of global-SNR. For all three optic-flow patterns, we found a {"}tradeoff{"} between local and global noise: Global-SNR thresholds decreased log-linearly as local-SNR increased, suggesting an interaction between local and global noise in the motion system. Above a certain local-SNR level, global-SNR thresholds remained constant. This saturation point was lower for circular motion compared to radial and translational optic-flow patterns, suggesting that global integration mechanisms for circular motion are more tolerant to disturbances from local noise.",
author = "LEE, {Alan Lap Fai} and ANN, {Chu Ning} and MAUS, {Gerrit W.}",
note = "Journal of Vision, Vol.16, No.12, Abstract Issue 2016.; Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 13-05-2016 Through 18-05-2016",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1167/16.12.398",
language = "English",

}

LEE, ALF, ANN, CN & MAUS, GW 2016, 'The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns' Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States, 13/05/16 - 18/05/16, . https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.398

The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns. / LEE, Alan Lap Fai; ANN, Chu Ning; MAUS, Gerrit W.

2016. Abstract from Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States.

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsAbstract

TY - CONF

T1 - The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns

AU - LEE, Alan Lap Fai

AU - ANN, Chu Ning

AU - MAUS, Gerrit W.

N1 - Journal of Vision, Vol.16, No.12, Abstract Issue 2016.

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Both the local and global stages of motion processing are susceptible to noise in the stimulus. Given the hierarchical nature of motion processing, how do the effects of local and global noise interact with each other? If such interaction exists, does it differ across different types of motion patterns? We addressed these questions using a novel psychophysical technique, in which uncertainty at the global and local stages of motion processing was independently manipulated within the same motion stimulus. We used a multiple-aperture motion pattern, which consisted of an array of randomly-oriented, drifting-Gabor elements (Amano et al., 2009). Global noise was manipulated based on motion coherence: Global signal-to-noise ratio (global-SNR) was defined as the ratio between signal and noise element numbers. Signal elements were assigned velocities consistent with a specific global motion direction, while noise elements were assigned velocities based on random global motion directions. Local noise was introduced by superimposing dynamic-noise pixels on each drifting Gabor patch at every motion frame. Local-SNR was defined as the ratio between the contrasts of Gabor patches and noise pixels. Observers performed a 2-choice, global-direction-judgment task on three optic-flow patterns: translational (left vs right), circular (clockwise vs counterclockwise), and radial (inward vs outward). In each block of trials, we fixed local-SNR and measured the 75%-accuracy threshold in terms of global-SNR. For all three optic-flow patterns, we found a "tradeoff" between local and global noise: Global-SNR thresholds decreased log-linearly as local-SNR increased, suggesting an interaction between local and global noise in the motion system. Above a certain local-SNR level, global-SNR thresholds remained constant. This saturation point was lower for circular motion compared to radial and translational optic-flow patterns, suggesting that global integration mechanisms for circular motion are more tolerant to disturbances from local noise.

AB - Both the local and global stages of motion processing are susceptible to noise in the stimulus. Given the hierarchical nature of motion processing, how do the effects of local and global noise interact with each other? If such interaction exists, does it differ across different types of motion patterns? We addressed these questions using a novel psychophysical technique, in which uncertainty at the global and local stages of motion processing was independently manipulated within the same motion stimulus. We used a multiple-aperture motion pattern, which consisted of an array of randomly-oriented, drifting-Gabor elements (Amano et al., 2009). Global noise was manipulated based on motion coherence: Global signal-to-noise ratio (global-SNR) was defined as the ratio between signal and noise element numbers. Signal elements were assigned velocities consistent with a specific global motion direction, while noise elements were assigned velocities based on random global motion directions. Local noise was introduced by superimposing dynamic-noise pixels on each drifting Gabor patch at every motion frame. Local-SNR was defined as the ratio between the contrasts of Gabor patches and noise pixels. Observers performed a 2-choice, global-direction-judgment task on three optic-flow patterns: translational (left vs right), circular (clockwise vs counterclockwise), and radial (inward vs outward). In each block of trials, we fixed local-SNR and measured the 75%-accuracy threshold in terms of global-SNR. For all three optic-flow patterns, we found a "tradeoff" between local and global noise: Global-SNR thresholds decreased log-linearly as local-SNR increased, suggesting an interaction between local and global noise in the motion system. Above a certain local-SNR level, global-SNR thresholds remained constant. This saturation point was lower for circular motion compared to radial and translational optic-flow patterns, suggesting that global integration mechanisms for circular motion are more tolerant to disturbances from local noise.

UR - https://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7591

U2 - 10.1167/16.12.398

DO - 10.1167/16.12.398

M3 - Abstract

ER -

LEE ALF, ANN CN, MAUS GW. The interaction between local and global noise for optic-flow patterns. 2016. Abstract from Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.398