The Interpretations of "Culture": American Conceptual Influences in the Formation of Chinese Sociology, 1929-1949

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsPresentation

Abstract

In both intellectual and institutional terms, there has been a strong American presence in the development of Chinese sociology ever since its inception. Such was the case in the formative period of 1930's-40's, when leading Chinese sociologists such as Sun Benwen and Wu Wenzao drew upon the works of their American counterparts to build up a more rigorous and coherent foundation of the discipline. The concept of culture in interwar American sociology played a pivotal role here, as it was appropriated and adapted to various academic projects. These included the attempt to work out a theoretical synthesis, the formulation of a scientific approach to social problem, the deployment of sociological knowledge in public discourse, the articulation of "culturology" as an interdisciplinary field, and the renewal of social survey as a viable research programme of community studies. This paper sets out to examine these competing projects and the manifold ways in which Chinese sociologists interpreted the relevant works of William Ogburn, Robert Park and other American sociologists in accordance with their emerging perspectives on culture and society. On the whole these interpretations and applications were equally tenable. But the restructuring of the national university system under changing conditions of state-building and war-making shifted the balance away from sociological theorizing in favor of anthropological fieldworks. By pinpointing how institutional factors and historical contexts shaped the strategies and outcomes of intellectual competition, this paper contributes to a deepened understanding of the global diffusion of social scientific knowledge and the formation of national sociological traditions.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2018
EventXIX ISA World Congress of Sociology - Canada, Toronto, Canada
Duration: 20 Jul 201820 Jul 2018
https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2018/webprogram/start.html

Conference

ConferenceXIX ISA World Congress of Sociology
CountryCanada
CityToronto
Period20/07/1820/07/18
OtherInternational Sociological Association (ISA)
Internet address

Fingerprint

sociologist
sociology
interpretation
university system
community research
social problem
institutional factors
restructuring
discourse
knowledge
Society

Cite this

@conference{72309fb40eb245bc8bbfc399abd735b5,
title = "The Interpretations of {"}Culture{"}: American Conceptual Influences in the Formation of Chinese Sociology, 1929-1949",
abstract = "In both intellectual and institutional terms, there has been a strong American presence in the development of Chinese sociology ever since its inception. Such was the case in the formative period of 1930's-40's, when leading Chinese sociologists such as Sun Benwen and Wu Wenzao drew upon the works of their American counterparts to build up a more rigorous and coherent foundation of the discipline. The concept of culture in interwar American sociology played a pivotal role here, as it was appropriated and adapted to various academic projects. These included the attempt to work out a theoretical synthesis, the formulation of a scientific approach to social problem, the deployment of sociological knowledge in public discourse, the articulation of {"}culturology{"} as an interdisciplinary field, and the renewal of social survey as a viable research programme of community studies. This paper sets out to examine these competing projects and the manifold ways in which Chinese sociologists interpreted the relevant works of William Ogburn, Robert Park and other American sociologists in accordance with their emerging perspectives on culture and society. On the whole these interpretations and applications were equally tenable. But the restructuring of the national university system under changing conditions of state-building and war-making shifted the balance away from sociological theorizing in favor of anthropological fieldworks. By pinpointing how institutional factors and historical contexts shaped the strategies and outcomes of intellectual competition, this paper contributes to a deepened understanding of the global diffusion of social scientific knowledge and the formation of national sociological traditions.",
author = "CHEN, {Hon Fai}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "19",
language = "English",
note = "XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology ; Conference date: 20-07-2018 Through 20-07-2018",
url = "https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2018/webprogram/start.html",

}

CHEN, HF 2018, 'The Interpretations of "Culture": American Conceptual Influences in the Formation of Chinese Sociology, 1929-1949', XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada, 20/07/18 - 20/07/18.

The Interpretations of "Culture": American Conceptual Influences in the Formation of Chinese Sociology, 1929-1949. / CHEN, Hon Fai.

2018. XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada.

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsPresentation

TY - CONF

T1 - The Interpretations of "Culture": American Conceptual Influences in the Formation of Chinese Sociology, 1929-1949

AU - CHEN, Hon Fai

PY - 2018/7/19

Y1 - 2018/7/19

N2 - In both intellectual and institutional terms, there has been a strong American presence in the development of Chinese sociology ever since its inception. Such was the case in the formative period of 1930's-40's, when leading Chinese sociologists such as Sun Benwen and Wu Wenzao drew upon the works of their American counterparts to build up a more rigorous and coherent foundation of the discipline. The concept of culture in interwar American sociology played a pivotal role here, as it was appropriated and adapted to various academic projects. These included the attempt to work out a theoretical synthesis, the formulation of a scientific approach to social problem, the deployment of sociological knowledge in public discourse, the articulation of "culturology" as an interdisciplinary field, and the renewal of social survey as a viable research programme of community studies. This paper sets out to examine these competing projects and the manifold ways in which Chinese sociologists interpreted the relevant works of William Ogburn, Robert Park and other American sociologists in accordance with their emerging perspectives on culture and society. On the whole these interpretations and applications were equally tenable. But the restructuring of the national university system under changing conditions of state-building and war-making shifted the balance away from sociological theorizing in favor of anthropological fieldworks. By pinpointing how institutional factors and historical contexts shaped the strategies and outcomes of intellectual competition, this paper contributes to a deepened understanding of the global diffusion of social scientific knowledge and the formation of national sociological traditions.

AB - In both intellectual and institutional terms, there has been a strong American presence in the development of Chinese sociology ever since its inception. Such was the case in the formative period of 1930's-40's, when leading Chinese sociologists such as Sun Benwen and Wu Wenzao drew upon the works of their American counterparts to build up a more rigorous and coherent foundation of the discipline. The concept of culture in interwar American sociology played a pivotal role here, as it was appropriated and adapted to various academic projects. These included the attempt to work out a theoretical synthesis, the formulation of a scientific approach to social problem, the deployment of sociological knowledge in public discourse, the articulation of "culturology" as an interdisciplinary field, and the renewal of social survey as a viable research programme of community studies. This paper sets out to examine these competing projects and the manifold ways in which Chinese sociologists interpreted the relevant works of William Ogburn, Robert Park and other American sociologists in accordance with their emerging perspectives on culture and society. On the whole these interpretations and applications were equally tenable. But the restructuring of the national university system under changing conditions of state-building and war-making shifted the balance away from sociological theorizing in favor of anthropological fieldworks. By pinpointing how institutional factors and historical contexts shaped the strategies and outcomes of intellectual competition, this paper contributes to a deepened understanding of the global diffusion of social scientific knowledge and the formation of national sociological traditions.

UR - https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2018/webprogram/Paper95428.html

M3 - Presentation

ER -