The lazy person’s approach to depiction

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

It has been argued (for example, by Nelson Goodman and John Hyman) that ‘depicts’ and similar terms such as ‘is a picture of’ and ‘represents’ are semantically ambiguous: sometimes they are two-place predicates expressing a relation, and sometimes they are not. This article takes issue with this claim and develops an alternative theory according to which the ambiguity in question is pragmatic rather than semantic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-104
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Volume73
Issue number2
Early online date24 Apr 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Person
Nelson Goodman

Cite this

@article{73713b5f321c4c749ab3e4c3e58da5ca,
title = "The lazy person’s approach to depiction",
abstract = "It has been argued (for example, by Nelson Goodman and John Hyman) that ‘depicts’ and similar terms such as ‘is a picture of’ and ‘represents’ are semantically ambiguous: sometimes they are two-place predicates expressing a relation, and sometimes they are not. This article takes issue with this claim and develops an alternative theory according to which the ambiguity in question is pragmatic rather than semantic.",
author = "{DE CLERCQ}, Rafael",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/jaac.12141",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "95--104",
journal = "Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism",
issn = "0021-8529",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

The lazy person’s approach to depiction. / DE CLERCQ, Rafael.

In: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 73, No. 2, 2015, p. 95-104.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - The lazy person’s approach to depiction

AU - DE CLERCQ, Rafael

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - It has been argued (for example, by Nelson Goodman and John Hyman) that ‘depicts’ and similar terms such as ‘is a picture of’ and ‘represents’ are semantically ambiguous: sometimes they are two-place predicates expressing a relation, and sometimes they are not. This article takes issue with this claim and develops an alternative theory according to which the ambiguity in question is pragmatic rather than semantic.

AB - It has been argued (for example, by Nelson Goodman and John Hyman) that ‘depicts’ and similar terms such as ‘is a picture of’ and ‘represents’ are semantically ambiguous: sometimes they are two-place predicates expressing a relation, and sometimes they are not. This article takes issue with this claim and develops an alternative theory according to which the ambiguity in question is pragmatic rather than semantic.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1887

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929179999&doi=10.1111%2fjaac.12141&partnerID=40&md5=4359ea0e4d4d62b6103da495cc4396bc

U2 - 10.1111/jaac.12141

DO - 10.1111/jaac.12141

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 73

SP - 95

EP - 104

JO - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

JF - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

SN - 0021-8529

IS - 2

ER -