The metaphysics of art restoration

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Art restorations often give rise to controversy, and the reason does not always seem to be a lack of skill or dedication on the side of the restorer. Rather, in some of the most famous cases, the reason seems to be a lack of agreement on basic principles. In particular, there seems to be a lack of agreement on how the following two questions are to be answered. First, what is art restoration supposed to achieve, in other words, what is the goal of restoration? Second, how can this goal be achieved, in other words, what are the means that a restorer can legitimately make use of? In this paper, I formulate, and defend, a principle that answers these questions. Although the principle may sound platitudinous, it has been contradicted by prominent philosophers and by important organizations concerned with conservation. Moreover, defending the principle turns out to be impossible without touching on such vexed philosophical issues as the ontology and identity of artworks, as well as the nature of perceptual and aesthetic properties (including the nature of artistic value).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-275
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Aesthetics
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Metaphysics
Art
Restoration
Philosophical Issues
Artwork
Aesthetic Properties
Dedication
Ontology
Conservation
Sound
Philosopher

Cite this

@article{6b7c3ab821ab4f5496b120861a021cc4,
title = "The metaphysics of art restoration",
abstract = "Art restorations often give rise to controversy, and the reason does not always seem to be a lack of skill or dedication on the side of the restorer. Rather, in some of the most famous cases, the reason seems to be a lack of agreement on basic principles. In particular, there seems to be a lack of agreement on how the following two questions are to be answered. First, what is art restoration supposed to achieve, in other words, what is the goal of restoration? Second, how can this goal be achieved, in other words, what are the means that a restorer can legitimately make use of? In this paper, I formulate, and defend, a principle that answers these questions. Although the principle may sound platitudinous, it has been contradicted by prominent philosophers and by important organizations concerned with conservation. Moreover, defending the principle turns out to be impossible without touching on such vexed philosophical issues as the ontology and identity of artworks, as well as the nature of perceptual and aesthetic properties (including the nature of artistic value).",
author = "{DE CLERCQ}, Rafael",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/aesthj/ayt013",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "261--275",
journal = "British Journal of Aesthetics",
issn = "0007-0904",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

The metaphysics of art restoration. / DE CLERCQ, Rafael .

In: British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 53, No. 3, 02.07.2013, p. 261-275.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The metaphysics of art restoration

AU - DE CLERCQ, Rafael

PY - 2013/7/2

Y1 - 2013/7/2

N2 - Art restorations often give rise to controversy, and the reason does not always seem to be a lack of skill or dedication on the side of the restorer. Rather, in some of the most famous cases, the reason seems to be a lack of agreement on basic principles. In particular, there seems to be a lack of agreement on how the following two questions are to be answered. First, what is art restoration supposed to achieve, in other words, what is the goal of restoration? Second, how can this goal be achieved, in other words, what are the means that a restorer can legitimately make use of? In this paper, I formulate, and defend, a principle that answers these questions. Although the principle may sound platitudinous, it has been contradicted by prominent philosophers and by important organizations concerned with conservation. Moreover, defending the principle turns out to be impossible without touching on such vexed philosophical issues as the ontology and identity of artworks, as well as the nature of perceptual and aesthetic properties (including the nature of artistic value).

AB - Art restorations often give rise to controversy, and the reason does not always seem to be a lack of skill or dedication on the side of the restorer. Rather, in some of the most famous cases, the reason seems to be a lack of agreement on basic principles. In particular, there seems to be a lack of agreement on how the following two questions are to be answered. First, what is art restoration supposed to achieve, in other words, what is the goal of restoration? Second, how can this goal be achieved, in other words, what are the means that a restorer can legitimately make use of? In this paper, I formulate, and defend, a principle that answers these questions. Although the principle may sound platitudinous, it has been contradicted by prominent philosophers and by important organizations concerned with conservation. Moreover, defending the principle turns out to be impossible without touching on such vexed philosophical issues as the ontology and identity of artworks, as well as the nature of perceptual and aesthetic properties (including the nature of artistic value).

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2430

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84883573214&doi=10.1093%2faesthj%2fayt013&partnerID=40&md5=29a4916cba5584b5732f20128ddcd53a

U2 - 10.1093/aesthj/ayt013

DO - 10.1093/aesthj/ayt013

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 53

SP - 261

EP - 275

JO - British Journal of Aesthetics

JF - British Journal of Aesthetics

SN - 0007-0904

IS - 3

ER -