The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research

Darrell Patrick ROWBOTTOM, Sarah Jane AISTON

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

20 Citations (Scopus)


Whether educational research should employ the ‘scientific method’ has been a recurring issue in its history. Hence, textbooks on research methods continue to perpetuate the idea that research students ought to choose between competing camps: ‘positivist’ or ‘interpretivist’. In reference to one of the most widely referred to educational research methods textbooks on the market—namely Research Methods in Education by Cohen, Manion, and Morrison—this paper demonstrates (1) the misconception of science in operation and (2) the perversely false dichotomy that has become enshrined in educational research. It then advocates a new approach, and suggests that the fixation with ‘science’ versus ‘non-science’ is counterproductive, when what is actually required for good inquiry is a critical approach to knowledge claims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-156
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Philosophy of Education
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Research Output

    • 20 Scopus Citations
    • 1 Book Chapter

    The Myth of ‘Scientific Method’ in Contemporary Educational Research

    ROWBOTTOM, D. P. & AISTON, S. J., 2015, Philosophy of education II. SMITH, R. (ed.). Routledge, p. 137-156

    Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook Chapter

    Cite this