Abstract
Tracing the origin of the national security argument for protection of domestic industries to Adam Smith, Alexander Hamilton, and Friedrich List, we study its post-GATT applications with reference to Article XXI of the WTO. We compare the use of tariff, production/input subsidy, and government procurement as alternative instruments of protection from the perspective of economic efficiency and study the disapproval of inward FDI to gain insights into the underlying national security concerns. The case studies of a) the US tariffs on aluminum and steel, b) German disapproval of the acquisition of a technology firm Leifeld Metal Spinning by a Chinese firm, and c) US’ all out global effort to cripple China’s telecom equipment giant Huawei are presented for illustration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | PSEI Working Paper Series |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Pan Sutong Shanghai-Hong Kong Economic Policy Research Institute |
| No. | 1 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The National Security Argument for Protection of Domestic Industries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Journal Article (refereed)
-
The national security argument for protection of domestic industries
CHENG, L. K., WHITTEN, G. W. & HUA, J., Apr 2020, In: Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 17, 4, p. 365-388 24 p.Research output: Journal Publications › Journal Article (refereed) › peer-review
3 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver