The ontology of interactivity

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

When discussing modern entertainment, people frequently use the terms “interactive” and “noninteractive” despite the fact that there is no clear consensus on what these concepts mean. To this point, in the book Rules of Play, Salen and Zimmerman write, “Interactivity is one of those words which can mean everything and nothing at once.” (2005: 58) Despite this ambiguity, there is an apparent consensus that interactivity is essential to understanding the difference between computer games and other forms of entertainment. It is often said that computer games are different from films, literature, and other works of art precisely because computer games are interactive and these other media are not. Not only is interactivity considered to be necessary to a computer game, but games are often criticized by gaming reviewers for having long noninteractive portions such as cutscenes, suggesting that interactivity is essential for a computer game to be successful (Newman 2004). So what is interactivity?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009
PublisherUniversity of Oslo
ISBN (Print)8291670579
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ontology
Interactivity
Computer games
Entertainment
Art
Gaming

Cite this

FROME, J. (2009). The ontology of interactivity. In Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009 University of Oslo.
FROME, Jonathan. / The ontology of interactivity. Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009. University of Oslo, 2009.
@inproceedings{62e844c857d44f3fa573d65dec908fe7,
title = "The ontology of interactivity",
abstract = "When discussing modern entertainment, people frequently use the terms “interactive” and “noninteractive” despite the fact that there is no clear consensus on what these concepts mean. To this point, in the book Rules of Play, Salen and Zimmerman write, “Interactivity is one of those words which can mean everything and nothing at once.” (2005: 58) Despite this ambiguity, there is an apparent consensus that interactivity is essential to understanding the difference between computer games and other forms of entertainment. It is often said that computer games are different from films, literature, and other works of art precisely because computer games are interactive and these other media are not. Not only is interactivity considered to be necessary to a computer game, but games are often criticized by gaming reviewers for having long noninteractive portions such as cutscenes, suggesting that interactivity is essential for a computer game to be successful (Newman 2004). So what is interactivity?",
author = "Jonathan FROME",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "8291670579",
booktitle = "Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009",
publisher = "University of Oslo",
address = "Norway",

}

FROME, J 2009, The ontology of interactivity. in Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009. University of Oslo.

The ontology of interactivity. / FROME, Jonathan.

Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009. University of Oslo, 2009.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - The ontology of interactivity

AU - FROME, Jonathan

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - When discussing modern entertainment, people frequently use the terms “interactive” and “noninteractive” despite the fact that there is no clear consensus on what these concepts mean. To this point, in the book Rules of Play, Salen and Zimmerman write, “Interactivity is one of those words which can mean everything and nothing at once.” (2005: 58) Despite this ambiguity, there is an apparent consensus that interactivity is essential to understanding the difference between computer games and other forms of entertainment. It is often said that computer games are different from films, literature, and other works of art precisely because computer games are interactive and these other media are not. Not only is interactivity considered to be necessary to a computer game, but games are often criticized by gaming reviewers for having long noninteractive portions such as cutscenes, suggesting that interactivity is essential for a computer game to be successful (Newman 2004). So what is interactivity?

AB - When discussing modern entertainment, people frequently use the terms “interactive” and “noninteractive” despite the fact that there is no clear consensus on what these concepts mean. To this point, in the book Rules of Play, Salen and Zimmerman write, “Interactivity is one of those words which can mean everything and nothing at once.” (2005: 58) Despite this ambiguity, there is an apparent consensus that interactivity is essential to understanding the difference between computer games and other forms of entertainment. It is often said that computer games are different from films, literature, and other works of art precisely because computer games are interactive and these other media are not. Not only is interactivity considered to be necessary to a computer game, but games are often criticized by gaming reviewers for having long noninteractive portions such as cutscenes, suggesting that interactivity is essential for a computer game to be successful (Newman 2004). So what is interactivity?

UR - http://gamephilosophy.org/download/philosophy_of_computer_games_conference_2009/Frome%20Jonathan%202009%20-%20The%20Ontology%20of%20Interactivity%20(1).pdf

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6136

M3 - Conference paper (refereed)

SN - 8291670579

BT - Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009

PB - University of Oslo

ER -

FROME J. The ontology of interactivity. In Proceedings of The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2009. University of Oslo. 2009