The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

"The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart" reviews two parallel traditions of semiotic realism represented by Plato and Husserl in the West and Mo Zi and Ouyang Jian in China respectively. These traditions were largely independent of each other before the 20th century, but they share two fundamental assumptions with regard to meaning. First, there exists an extrasemiotic world with its own qualities and attributes. Second, human consciousness is capable of knowing and then representing the external world with the help of language. Although there have arisen some different theories on this issue over the centuries, few of them seem to have systematically challenged Mo Zi and Plato’s presupposition of an ontological reality which gives rise to meaning, hence the historical dominance of the realist theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-56
Number of pages16
JournalSigns - International journal of semiotics
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Triad
Mozi
Language
Ontological
Edmund Husserl
Presupposition
China
Realism
Realist
External World
Fundamental
Human Consciousness
Plato

Keywords

  • Chinese semiotics
  • Plato
  • The semiotic triangle
  • semiotic realism

Cite this

@article{a243f1418add44fea91da629bae1f858,
title = "The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart",
abstract = "{"}The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart{"} reviews two parallel traditions of semiotic realism represented by Plato and Husserl in the West and Mo Zi and Ouyang Jian in China respectively. These traditions were largely independent of each other before the 20th century, but they share two fundamental assumptions with regard to meaning. First, there exists an extrasemiotic world with its own qualities and attributes. Second, human consciousness is capable of knowing and then representing the external world with the help of language. Although there have arisen some different theories on this issue over the centuries, few of them seem to have systematically challenged Mo Zi and Plato’s presupposition of an ontological reality which gives rise to meaning, hence the historical dominance of the realist theory.",
keywords = "Chinese semiotics, Plato, The semiotic triangle, semiotic realism",
author = "Ersu DING",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "41--56",
journal = "Signs - International journal of semiotics",
issn = "1902-8822",

}

The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart. / DING, Ersu.

In: Signs - International journal of semiotics, Vol. 3, 01.01.2009, p. 41-56.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart

AU - DING, Ersu

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - "The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart" reviews two parallel traditions of semiotic realism represented by Plato and Husserl in the West and Mo Zi and Ouyang Jian in China respectively. These traditions were largely independent of each other before the 20th century, but they share two fundamental assumptions with regard to meaning. First, there exists an extrasemiotic world with its own qualities and attributes. Second, human consciousness is capable of knowing and then representing the external world with the help of language. Although there have arisen some different theories on this issue over the centuries, few of them seem to have systematically challenged Mo Zi and Plato’s presupposition of an ontological reality which gives rise to meaning, hence the historical dominance of the realist theory.

AB - "The Platonic Triad and Its Chinese Counterpart" reviews two parallel traditions of semiotic realism represented by Plato and Husserl in the West and Mo Zi and Ouyang Jian in China respectively. These traditions were largely independent of each other before the 20th century, but they share two fundamental assumptions with regard to meaning. First, there exists an extrasemiotic world with its own qualities and attributes. Second, human consciousness is capable of knowing and then representing the external world with the help of language. Although there have arisen some different theories on this issue over the centuries, few of them seem to have systematically challenged Mo Zi and Plato’s presupposition of an ontological reality which gives rise to meaning, hence the historical dominance of the realist theory.

KW - Chinese semiotics

KW - Plato

KW - The semiotic triangle

KW - semiotic realism

UR - https://tidsskrift.dk/index.php/signs/article/view/71456/128791

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1903

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 3

SP - 41

EP - 56

JO - Signs - International journal of semiotics

JF - Signs - International journal of semiotics

SN - 1902-8822

ER -