The problem of "unmasking" in "ideology and utopia" : Karl Mannheim, Karl Jaspers and Hannah Arendt

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the French Revolution, intellectual and popular cultures of the West have been characterized by tropes of “unmasking,” a kind of exposure that purports to show mendacity and domination operating unseen beneath the surface of human affairs. Karl Mannheim was a particularly astute commentator on this phenomenon. His Ideology and Utopia (1929) and cognate writings offer an account of unmasking that is detailed, contextual, nuanced and critical. While he grants that unmasking was a condition of sociology’s emergence, Mannheim argues that it has outlived its usefulness for purposes of explanatory understanding. He further decries the destructive impact of unmasking on political discourse: an openly debunking attitude poisons the well of principled dialogue by claiming one’s interlocutor to be either a charlatan or a dupe of history. Critics such as Hannah Arendt and her mentor Karl Jaspers went further, condemning unmasking as execrable in principle and depicting sociology and psychology as major casualties of its rhetorical excesses – Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge included. This article describes Mannheim’s analysis of unmasking, the rhetorical moves he employed to move beyond the unmasking mode, and objections to his project of Jaspers and Arendt. Mannheim’s reception is muted today while Arendt’s is on a steadily rising curve of appreciation. But a reconstruction of Mannheim’s ideas on unmasking reveals an author who, at the time Arendt sparred with him, demonstrated a far greater comprehension than she did of the history and stakes of a topos that pervades modern thinking.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
JournalSociologica : Italian Journal of Sociology On-Line
Volume2013
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

utopia
ideology
sociology of knowledge
French revolution
history
popular culture
domination
grant
critic
comprehension
sociology
reconstruction
psychology
dialogue
discourse
time

Bibliographical note

The research for this article was generously supported by a Hong Kong Research Grants Council award, CB11A2, on “Hannah Arendt’s Appraisal of Sociology: Historical Sources and Theoretical Stakes of an Intellectual Controversy.”

Keywords

  • Arendt
  • exposure
  • Jaspers
  • Mannheim
  • sociology
  • unmasking

Cite this

@article{ccb9654ada554bcd9b512f0bd10bf6ee,
title = "The problem of {"}unmasking{"} in {"}ideology and utopia{"} : Karl Mannheim, Karl Jaspers and Hannah Arendt",
abstract = "Since the French Revolution, intellectual and popular cultures of the West have been characterized by tropes of “unmasking,” a kind of exposure that purports to show mendacity and domination operating unseen beneath the surface of human affairs. Karl Mannheim was a particularly astute commentator on this phenomenon. His Ideology and Utopia (1929) and cognate writings offer an account of unmasking that is detailed, contextual, nuanced and critical. While he grants that unmasking was a condition of sociology’s emergence, Mannheim argues that it has outlived its usefulness for purposes of explanatory understanding. He further decries the destructive impact of unmasking on political discourse: an openly debunking attitude poisons the well of principled dialogue by claiming one’s interlocutor to be either a charlatan or a dupe of history. Critics such as Hannah Arendt and her mentor Karl Jaspers went further, condemning unmasking as execrable in principle and depicting sociology and psychology as major casualties of its rhetorical excesses – Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge included. This article describes Mannheim’s analysis of unmasking, the rhetorical moves he employed to move beyond the unmasking mode, and objections to his project of Jaspers and Arendt. Mannheim’s reception is muted today while Arendt’s is on a steadily rising curve of appreciation. But a reconstruction of Mannheim’s ideas on unmasking reveals an author who, at the time Arendt sparred with him, demonstrated a far greater comprehension than she did of the history and stakes of a topos that pervades modern thinking.",
keywords = "Arendt, exposure, Jaspers, Mannheim, sociology, unmasking",
author = "BAEHR, {William Peter}",
note = "The research for this article was generously supported by a Hong Kong Research Grants Council award, CB11A2, on “Hannah Arendt’s Appraisal of Sociology: Historical Sources and Theoretical Stakes of an Intellectual Controversy.”",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2383/73713",
language = "English",
volume = "2013",
pages = "1--32",
journal = "Sociologica",
issn = "1971-8853",
publisher = "Societa Editrice Il Mulino",
number = "1",

}

The problem of "unmasking" in "ideology and utopia" : Karl Mannheim, Karl Jaspers and Hannah Arendt. / BAEHR, William Peter.

In: Sociologica : Italian Journal of Sociology On-Line, Vol. 2013, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 1-32.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - The problem of "unmasking" in "ideology and utopia" : Karl Mannheim, Karl Jaspers and Hannah Arendt

AU - BAEHR, William Peter

N1 - The research for this article was generously supported by a Hong Kong Research Grants Council award, CB11A2, on “Hannah Arendt’s Appraisal of Sociology: Historical Sources and Theoretical Stakes of an Intellectual Controversy.”

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Since the French Revolution, intellectual and popular cultures of the West have been characterized by tropes of “unmasking,” a kind of exposure that purports to show mendacity and domination operating unseen beneath the surface of human affairs. Karl Mannheim was a particularly astute commentator on this phenomenon. His Ideology and Utopia (1929) and cognate writings offer an account of unmasking that is detailed, contextual, nuanced and critical. While he grants that unmasking was a condition of sociology’s emergence, Mannheim argues that it has outlived its usefulness for purposes of explanatory understanding. He further decries the destructive impact of unmasking on political discourse: an openly debunking attitude poisons the well of principled dialogue by claiming one’s interlocutor to be either a charlatan or a dupe of history. Critics such as Hannah Arendt and her mentor Karl Jaspers went further, condemning unmasking as execrable in principle and depicting sociology and psychology as major casualties of its rhetorical excesses – Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge included. This article describes Mannheim’s analysis of unmasking, the rhetorical moves he employed to move beyond the unmasking mode, and objections to his project of Jaspers and Arendt. Mannheim’s reception is muted today while Arendt’s is on a steadily rising curve of appreciation. But a reconstruction of Mannheim’s ideas on unmasking reveals an author who, at the time Arendt sparred with him, demonstrated a far greater comprehension than she did of the history and stakes of a topos that pervades modern thinking.

AB - Since the French Revolution, intellectual and popular cultures of the West have been characterized by tropes of “unmasking,” a kind of exposure that purports to show mendacity and domination operating unseen beneath the surface of human affairs. Karl Mannheim was a particularly astute commentator on this phenomenon. His Ideology and Utopia (1929) and cognate writings offer an account of unmasking that is detailed, contextual, nuanced and critical. While he grants that unmasking was a condition of sociology’s emergence, Mannheim argues that it has outlived its usefulness for purposes of explanatory understanding. He further decries the destructive impact of unmasking on political discourse: an openly debunking attitude poisons the well of principled dialogue by claiming one’s interlocutor to be either a charlatan or a dupe of history. Critics such as Hannah Arendt and her mentor Karl Jaspers went further, condemning unmasking as execrable in principle and depicting sociology and psychology as major casualties of its rhetorical excesses – Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge included. This article describes Mannheim’s analysis of unmasking, the rhetorical moves he employed to move beyond the unmasking mode, and objections to his project of Jaspers and Arendt. Mannheim’s reception is muted today while Arendt’s is on a steadily rising curve of appreciation. But a reconstruction of Mannheim’s ideas on unmasking reveals an author who, at the time Arendt sparred with him, demonstrated a far greater comprehension than she did of the history and stakes of a topos that pervades modern thinking.

KW - Arendt

KW - exposure

KW - Jaspers

KW - Mannheim

KW - sociology

KW - unmasking

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3943

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84886646273&doi=10.2383%2f73713&partnerID=40&md5=d4f30360a99a6699579d50822f13d5f6

U2 - 10.2383/73713

DO - 10.2383/73713

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 2013

SP - 1

EP - 32

JO - Sociologica

JF - Sociologica

SN - 1971-8853

IS - 1

ER -