The role of Asia-Pacific organizations in maintaining regional security

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are two regular regional security organizations in Asia-the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)-through which regional states are involved in managing security pertaining to Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific, respectively. Since 2001, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' meetings have addressed aspects of economic security. Whereas the SCO seems well institutionalized and purposeful, the ARF appears weakly structured and ineffective. This is because. while member states of the SCO are generally trustful of one another and hold in common most security objectives, concerns, and norms in the organization, many member states of the ARF have uneasy relations among themselves and share few security objectives, concerns, and norms in the forum. Moreover, while the SCO 44 represents priority multilateral foreign and Security policy interests for the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) and Russia, its two most important constituents, the ARF represents a secondary or fall-back position for the bilateral-first foreign and security policy relations of its major players like Japan, United States, and the PRC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-185
Number of pages17
JournalKorean Journal of Defense Analysis
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2008

Fingerprint

ASEAN
organization
security policy
foreign policy
APEC
China
Economics
Russia
Japan
leader
economics

Cite this

@article{351fc6effc6449c6861f14bb6a62237c,
title = "The role of Asia-Pacific organizations in maintaining regional security",
abstract = "There are two regular regional security organizations in Asia-the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)-through which regional states are involved in managing security pertaining to Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific, respectively. Since 2001, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' meetings have addressed aspects of economic security. Whereas the SCO seems well institutionalized and purposeful, the ARF appears weakly structured and ineffective. This is because. while member states of the SCO are generally trustful of one another and hold in common most security objectives, concerns, and norms in the organization, many member states of the ARF have uneasy relations among themselves and share few security objectives, concerns, and norms in the forum. Moreover, while the SCO 44 represents priority multilateral foreign and Security policy interests for the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) and Russia, its two most important constituents, the ARF represents a secondary or fall-back position for the bilateral-first foreign and security policy relations of its major players like Japan, United States, and the PRC.",
author = "CHUNG, {Chien Peng}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10163270802062803",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "169--185",
journal = "Korean Journal of Defense Analysis",
issn = "1016-3271",
publisher = "Korea Institute for Defense Analyses",
number = "2",

}

The role of Asia-Pacific organizations in maintaining regional security. / CHUNG, Chien Peng.

In: Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 169-185.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of Asia-Pacific organizations in maintaining regional security

AU - CHUNG, Chien Peng

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - There are two regular regional security organizations in Asia-the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)-through which regional states are involved in managing security pertaining to Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific, respectively. Since 2001, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' meetings have addressed aspects of economic security. Whereas the SCO seems well institutionalized and purposeful, the ARF appears weakly structured and ineffective. This is because. while member states of the SCO are generally trustful of one another and hold in common most security objectives, concerns, and norms in the organization, many member states of the ARF have uneasy relations among themselves and share few security objectives, concerns, and norms in the forum. Moreover, while the SCO 44 represents priority multilateral foreign and Security policy interests for the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) and Russia, its two most important constituents, the ARF represents a secondary or fall-back position for the bilateral-first foreign and security policy relations of its major players like Japan, United States, and the PRC.

AB - There are two regular regional security organizations in Asia-the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)-through which regional states are involved in managing security pertaining to Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific, respectively. Since 2001, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' meetings have addressed aspects of economic security. Whereas the SCO seems well institutionalized and purposeful, the ARF appears weakly structured and ineffective. This is because. while member states of the SCO are generally trustful of one another and hold in common most security objectives, concerns, and norms in the organization, many member states of the ARF have uneasy relations among themselves and share few security objectives, concerns, and norms in the forum. Moreover, while the SCO 44 represents priority multilateral foreign and Security policy interests for the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) and Russia, its two most important constituents, the ARF represents a secondary or fall-back position for the bilateral-first foreign and security policy relations of its major players like Japan, United States, and the PRC.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2274

U2 - 10.1080/10163270802062803

DO - 10.1080/10163270802062803

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 20

SP - 169

EP - 185

JO - Korean Journal of Defense Analysis

JF - Korean Journal of Defense Analysis

SN - 1016-3271

IS - 2

ER -