The "three happiness" and public policy

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this chapter, we will explore the nature of happiness and its determinants, and in particular the kind of institutions most likely to enhance happiness. Section II will argue that utility in Bentham’s sense is not happiness. Section III will present a theory of happiness and propose a framework involving a “forward looking happiness”, a “happiness in process”, and finally a “backward looking happiness”. Section IV uses this framework to explain some paradoxes that have been referred to by various happiness scholars. Section V then goes on to examine some policy implications of the framework. Here I shall argue that policy design should aim at maximizing the ex ante welfare of the representative individual, rather than “maximizing the greatest happiness of the greatest number” as advocated by Bentham, and I shall relate ex ante welfare to Rawlsian justice as well as to the concept of “residual risk”, which is the risk one gets exposed to involuntarily. Finally, section VI argues that “conflict resolution”, both internal within one’s mind and external in terms of relating harmoniously to other individuals will enhance happiness and we define such a holistic attitude to life “spiritual practice.” Thus “spiritual practice” is not mystical or “other worldly” at all. Rather it just entails overcoming one’s own weaknesses and handicaps, developing one’s full potential, and taking a holistic view of one’s life instead of being excessively concerned about marginal gains and marginal losses of the moment. This “transcendental attitude” would seem to be directly in conflict with economic principles of maximization but in a natural development as one becomes more mature and developed spiritually over time.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHappiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages47-66
Number of pages20
ISBN (Print)230004970
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006

Fingerprint

happiness
public policy
welfare
Handicap
conflict resolution
justice
determinants

Cite this

HO, L. S. (2006). The "three happiness" and public policy. In Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications (pp. 47-66). Palgrave Macmillan.
HO, Lok Sang. / The "three happiness" and public policy. Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. pp. 47-66
@inbook{9653671c5ef24fb8b1ddf6367763d677,
title = "The {"}three happiness{"} and public policy",
abstract = "In this chapter, we will explore the nature of happiness and its determinants, and in particular the kind of institutions most likely to enhance happiness. Section II will argue that utility in Bentham’s sense is not happiness. Section III will present a theory of happiness and propose a framework involving a “forward looking happiness”, a “happiness in process”, and finally a “backward looking happiness”. Section IV uses this framework to explain some paradoxes that have been referred to by various happiness scholars. Section V then goes on to examine some policy implications of the framework. Here I shall argue that policy design should aim at maximizing the ex ante welfare of the representative individual, rather than “maximizing the greatest happiness of the greatest number” as advocated by Bentham, and I shall relate ex ante welfare to Rawlsian justice as well as to the concept of “residual risk”, which is the risk one gets exposed to involuntarily. Finally, section VI argues that “conflict resolution”, both internal within one’s mind and external in terms of relating harmoniously to other individuals will enhance happiness and we define such a holistic attitude to life “spiritual practice.” Thus “spiritual practice” is not mystical or “other worldly” at all. Rather it just entails overcoming one’s own weaknesses and handicaps, developing one’s full potential, and taking a holistic view of one’s life instead of being excessively concerned about marginal gains and marginal losses of the moment. This “transcendental attitude” would seem to be directly in conflict with economic principles of maximization but in a natural development as one becomes more mature and developed spiritually over time.",
author = "HO, {Lok Sang}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "230004970",
pages = "47--66",
booktitle = "Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

HO, LS 2006, The "three happiness" and public policy. in Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 47-66.

The "three happiness" and public policy. / HO, Lok Sang.

Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. p. 47-66.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The "three happiness" and public policy

AU - HO, Lok Sang

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - In this chapter, we will explore the nature of happiness and its determinants, and in particular the kind of institutions most likely to enhance happiness. Section II will argue that utility in Bentham’s sense is not happiness. Section III will present a theory of happiness and propose a framework involving a “forward looking happiness”, a “happiness in process”, and finally a “backward looking happiness”. Section IV uses this framework to explain some paradoxes that have been referred to by various happiness scholars. Section V then goes on to examine some policy implications of the framework. Here I shall argue that policy design should aim at maximizing the ex ante welfare of the representative individual, rather than “maximizing the greatest happiness of the greatest number” as advocated by Bentham, and I shall relate ex ante welfare to Rawlsian justice as well as to the concept of “residual risk”, which is the risk one gets exposed to involuntarily. Finally, section VI argues that “conflict resolution”, both internal within one’s mind and external in terms of relating harmoniously to other individuals will enhance happiness and we define such a holistic attitude to life “spiritual practice.” Thus “spiritual practice” is not mystical or “other worldly” at all. Rather it just entails overcoming one’s own weaknesses and handicaps, developing one’s full potential, and taking a holistic view of one’s life instead of being excessively concerned about marginal gains and marginal losses of the moment. This “transcendental attitude” would seem to be directly in conflict with economic principles of maximization but in a natural development as one becomes more mature and developed spiritually over time.

AB - In this chapter, we will explore the nature of happiness and its determinants, and in particular the kind of institutions most likely to enhance happiness. Section II will argue that utility in Bentham’s sense is not happiness. Section III will present a theory of happiness and propose a framework involving a “forward looking happiness”, a “happiness in process”, and finally a “backward looking happiness”. Section IV uses this framework to explain some paradoxes that have been referred to by various happiness scholars. Section V then goes on to examine some policy implications of the framework. Here I shall argue that policy design should aim at maximizing the ex ante welfare of the representative individual, rather than “maximizing the greatest happiness of the greatest number” as advocated by Bentham, and I shall relate ex ante welfare to Rawlsian justice as well as to the concept of “residual risk”, which is the risk one gets exposed to involuntarily. Finally, section VI argues that “conflict resolution”, both internal within one’s mind and external in terms of relating harmoniously to other individuals will enhance happiness and we define such a holistic attitude to life “spiritual practice.” Thus “spiritual practice” is not mystical or “other worldly” at all. Rather it just entails overcoming one’s own weaknesses and handicaps, developing one’s full potential, and taking a holistic view of one’s life instead of being excessively concerned about marginal gains and marginal losses of the moment. This “transcendental attitude” would seem to be directly in conflict with economic principles of maximization but in a natural development as one becomes more mature and developed spiritually over time.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/91

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 230004970

SP - 47

EP - 66

BT - Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

HO LS. The "three happiness" and public policy. In Happiness and public policy: Theory, case studies and implications. Palgrave Macmillan. 2006. p. 47-66