Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The varieties of normativity

  • Derek BAKER*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There are a variety of phenomena that appear to be normative in one way or another, and not always in the same way. This chapter explores what the author takes to be the most fundamental division within the normative: that between merely formal normativity and full-blooded authoritative normativity. It then discusses a series of further distinctions within the normative and argues that all of these crosscut the formal-authoritative distinction, which is sui generis. The chapter present reasons for skepticism about authoritative normativity. This, like most forms of philosophical skepticism, is advocated not so much because the author is convinced; rather, it is part of the venerable tradition of trying to get philosophers to stop being so easy on themselves. Philosophers have proposed understanding both morality and epistemology in terms of virtues, stable character traits that produce or prevent certain characteristic effects.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Metaethics
EditorsTristram MCPHERSON, David PLUNKETT
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter36
Pages567-581
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781315213217
ISBN (Print)9781138812208
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.

Funding

Research appearing in this chapter was partially funded by a grant from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (LU342612).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The varieties of normativity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this