Their Lenin, Our Lenin: Proper Names and the Politics of Revolutionary Mourning in Early Chinese Marxism

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

How should revolutionaries mourn the dead? What distinguishes a communist practice of mourning from that oriented toward the preservation of the capitalist state form? This article seeks to answer these questions via an examination of the responses of early members of the Chinese Communist Party to the deaths of major revolutionary figures, above all that of Lenin in 1924. It argues that Lenin’s death became a vital site of cultural politics under the conditions of the First United Front. Chinese communists sought to resist the reduction of Lenin to an individuated, heroic figure whose political work could be limited to the political form of the disciplined party organization and instead situated Lenin on an internationalist horizon, as a figure to be emulated by communists globally, alongside other deceased figures such as Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-209
Number of pages34
JournalModern China
Volume52
Issue number2
Early online date28 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026

Funding

This research received support via the Hong Kong General Research Fund (project number: 13604125).

Keywords

  • Lenin
  • Marxism
  • mourning
  • Qu Qiubai
  • Jiang Guangci

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Their Lenin, Our Lenin: Proper Names and the Politics of Revolutionary Mourning in Early Chinese Marxism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this