Abstract
A popular statistical approach, the fixed-effects regression model is known for its ability to produce unbiased coefficients by adjusting for unobserved time-invariant individual heterogeneity. This ability is contingent on the assumption that time-invariant variables must not have time-varying effects, which, otherwise, would interfere in the process of coefficient estimation. In ascriptive inequality research that focuses on relatively fixed identities such as race and gender, this assumption is often overlooked, leading to misinterpretations of the findings. Demonstrating with case studies, we intend to explain and clarify two types of such misinterpretations: (1) time-invariant variables' time-varying effects, when measured in the model, are mistaken as time-invariant variables' unbiased coefficient estimates; (2) time-invariant variables' time-varying effects, when unmeasured in the model, confound coefficient estimates of time-varying variables.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70113 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Sociology Compass |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 12 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Sociology Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- fixed-effects
- gender
- race
- unbiased estimation
- Wage inequality