Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries

John HUDSON, Stefan KÜHNER

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous analysts have suggested that globalization and the emergence of more knowledge-based economies have encouraged high-income nations to shift towards a model of productive welfare focused on social investment, yet typologies of welfare are still largely drawn on the basis of measures of social protection rather than social investment. Here we develop a classification of welfare state types that incorporates both productive and protective elements of social policy. Using fuzzy set ideal type analysis we explore data for a sample of 23 OECD countries in three time points: 1994, 1998 and 2003. Our findings provide no more than very modest support for claims that welfare states are shifting from protective to productive modes of provision and, in many cases, we identify a shift in the alternative direction. In addition, we identify some nations that are clearly productive in their focus and others that manage to combine productive and protective features.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-36
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of European Social Policy
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social investment
OECD
welfare state
welfare
ideal type
social policy
typology
globalization
income
economy
knowledge
analysis
Social Policy
time
social protection

Cite this

@article{14874d5cfa284922b653e8bdc930f501,
title = "Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries",
abstract = "Numerous analysts have suggested that globalization and the emergence of more knowledge-based economies have encouraged high-income nations to shift towards a model of productive welfare focused on social investment, yet typologies of welfare are still largely drawn on the basis of measures of social protection rather than social investment. Here we develop a classification of welfare state types that incorporates both productive and protective elements of social policy. Using fuzzy set ideal type analysis we explore data for a sample of 23 OECD countries in three time points: 1994, 1998 and 2003. Our findings provide no more than very modest support for claims that welfare states are shifting from protective to productive modes of provision and, in many cases, we identify a shift in the alternative direction. In addition, we identify some nations that are clearly productive in their focus and others that manage to combine productive and protective features.",
author = "John HUDSON and Stefan K{\"U}HNER",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0958928708098522",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "34--36",
journal = "Journal of European Social Policy",
issn = "0958-9287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries. / HUDSON, John; KÜHNER, Stefan.

In: Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.02.2009, p. 34-36.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries

AU - HUDSON, John

AU - KÜHNER, Stefan

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Numerous analysts have suggested that globalization and the emergence of more knowledge-based economies have encouraged high-income nations to shift towards a model of productive welfare focused on social investment, yet typologies of welfare are still largely drawn on the basis of measures of social protection rather than social investment. Here we develop a classification of welfare state types that incorporates both productive and protective elements of social policy. Using fuzzy set ideal type analysis we explore data for a sample of 23 OECD countries in three time points: 1994, 1998 and 2003. Our findings provide no more than very modest support for claims that welfare states are shifting from protective to productive modes of provision and, in many cases, we identify a shift in the alternative direction. In addition, we identify some nations that are clearly productive in their focus and others that manage to combine productive and protective features.

AB - Numerous analysts have suggested that globalization and the emergence of more knowledge-based economies have encouraged high-income nations to shift towards a model of productive welfare focused on social investment, yet typologies of welfare are still largely drawn on the basis of measures of social protection rather than social investment. Here we develop a classification of welfare state types that incorporates both productive and protective elements of social policy. Using fuzzy set ideal type analysis we explore data for a sample of 23 OECD countries in three time points: 1994, 1998 and 2003. Our findings provide no more than very modest support for claims that welfare states are shifting from protective to productive modes of provision and, in many cases, we identify a shift in the alternative direction. In addition, we identify some nations that are clearly productive in their focus and others that manage to combine productive and protective features.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4774

U2 - 10.1177/0958928708098522

DO - 10.1177/0958928708098522

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 19

SP - 34

EP - 36

JO - Journal of European Social Policy

JF - Journal of European Social Policy

SN - 0958-9287

IS - 1

ER -