Two conceptions of response-dependence

Rafael DE CLERCQ

doi:10.1023/A:1014708132150

Two conceptions of response-dependence

Rafael DE CLERCQ

Research output: Journal Publications › Journal Article (refereed) › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The traditional conception of response-dependence isinadequate because it cannot account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence. In particular, it is unableto account for the response-dependence of (aesthetic, moral, epistemic ...) values. I therefore propose tosupplement the traditional conception with an alternativeone. My claim is that only a combination of the twoconceptions is able to account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	159-177
Number of pages	19
Journal	Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition
Volume	107
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014708132150
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2002
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1023/A:1014708132150

Cite this

@article{15b0c1a7c1a0472eb1d3683f6d6d0562,

title = "Two conceptions of response-dependence",

abstract = "The traditional conception of response-dependence isinadequate because it cannot account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence. In particular, it is unableto account for the response-dependence of (aesthetic, moral, epistemic ...) values. I therefore propose tosupplement the traditional conception with an alternativeone. My claim is that only a combination of the twoconceptions is able to account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence.",

author = "{DE CLERCQ}, Rafael",

year = "2002",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1023/A:1014708132150",

language = "English",

volume = "107",

pages = "159--177",

journal = "Philosophical Studies",

issn = "0031-8116",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two conceptions of response-dependence

AU - DE CLERCQ, Rafael

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The traditional conception of response-dependence isinadequate because it cannot account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence. In particular, it is unableto account for the response-dependence of (aesthetic, moral, epistemic ...) values. I therefore propose tosupplement the traditional conception with an alternativeone. My claim is that only a combination of the twoconceptions is able to account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence.

AB - The traditional conception of response-dependence isinadequate because it cannot account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence. In particular, it is unableto account for the response-dependence of (aesthetic, moral, epistemic ...) values. I therefore propose tosupplement the traditional conception with an alternativeone. My claim is that only a combination of the twoconceptions is able to account for all intuitivecases of response-dependence.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1882

U2 - 10.1023/A:1014708132150

DO - 10.1023/A:1014708132150

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

SN - 0031-8116

VL - 107

SP - 159

EP - 177

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

IS - 2

ER -

Two conceptions of response-dependence

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this