Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign. This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-135
Number of pages17
JournalSemiotica
Volume2014
Issue number200
Early online date23 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

language
Iconicity
Language
Icon
Arbitrariness

Keywords

  • Saussure
  • Peirce
  • arbitrariness of signs
  • motivatedness of signs
  • indexicality

Cite this

DING, Ersu. / Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity. In: Semiotica. 2014 ; Vol. 2014, No. 200. pp. 119-135.
@article{9d52540a172145e996bd341dca7e8ddd,
title = "Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity",
abstract = "This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign. This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign.",
keywords = "Saussure, Peirce, arbitrariness of signs, motivatedness of signs, indexicality",
author = "Ersu DING",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1515/sem-2014-0013",
language = "English",
volume = "2014",
pages = "119--135",
journal = "Semiotica",
issn = "0037-1998",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "200",

}

Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity. / DING, Ersu.

In: Semiotica, Vol. 2014, No. 200, 06.2014, p. 119-135.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ubiquitous but arbitrary iconicity

AU - DING, Ersu

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign. This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign.

AB - This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign. This paper addresses the issue of iconicity, which is largely neglected by Saussure for playing only a minor role in language. What it tries to show through ample examples is that iconicity exists at every level of language, but more importantly and contrary to popular belief, that the motivatedness of indices and icons does not in any way contradict the notion of the arbitrariness of the sign.

KW - Saussure

KW - Peirce

KW - arbitrariness of signs

KW - motivatedness of signs

KW - indexicality

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1662

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902690201&doi=10.1515%2fsem-2014-0013&partnerID=40&md5=35e4b235de1025a0604002e4ae17f081

U2 - 10.1515/sem-2014-0013

DO - 10.1515/sem-2014-0013

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 2014

SP - 119

EP - 135

JO - Semiotica

JF - Semiotica

SN - 0037-1998

IS - 200

ER -