Unmasking and disclosure as sociological practices : contrasting modes for understanding religious and other beliefs

William Peter BAEHR, Daniel GORDON

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unmasking is a recurrent feature of modern sociology and cultural criticism. While false consciousness is imputed by intellectuals to religious groups and to certain social classes, unmasking is, or claims to be, a corrective performed by intellectuals themselves. Unmasking supposes that enlightened enquirers are able to help the less rational to understand their real interests; a type of exposure, it offers a cognitive tool of emancipation. This article (a) examines unmasking; and (b) contrasts it with an approach to understanding that we call disclosure. Our claim is that disclosure is more attuned to the full keyboard of social action, and less demeaning of its players, than unmasking is. Disclosure attempts to grasp what actions are like for those who enact them. Nothing has been more often or consistently unmasked and with more venom than religion. It is the main example explored in this article.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-396
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Sociology
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Fingerprint

intellectual
cultural criticism
religious group
emancipation
social class
consciousness
sociology
Religion

Cite this

@article{67d1d2c94cf34c7690aff34fe66ad9d5,
title = "Unmasking and disclosure as sociological practices : contrasting modes for understanding religious and other beliefs",
abstract = "Unmasking is a recurrent feature of modern sociology and cultural criticism. While false consciousness is imputed by intellectuals to religious groups and to certain social classes, unmasking is, or claims to be, a corrective performed by intellectuals themselves. Unmasking supposes that enlightened enquirers are able to help the less rational to understand their real interests; a type of exposure, it offers a cognitive tool of emancipation. This article (a) examines unmasking; and (b) contrasts it with an approach to understanding that we call disclosure. Our claim is that disclosure is more attuned to the full keyboard of social action, and less demeaning of its players, than unmasking is. Disclosure attempts to grasp what actions are like for those who enact them. Nothing has been more often or consistently unmasked and with more venom than religion. It is the main example explored in this article.",
author = "BAEHR, {William Peter} and Daniel GORDON",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1440783312458225",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "380--396",
journal = "Journal of Sociology",
issn = "1440-7833",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Unmasking and disclosure as sociological practices : contrasting modes for understanding religious and other beliefs. / BAEHR, William Peter; GORDON, Daniel.

In: Journal of Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 380-396.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unmasking and disclosure as sociological practices : contrasting modes for understanding religious and other beliefs

AU - BAEHR, William Peter

AU - GORDON, Daniel

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Unmasking is a recurrent feature of modern sociology and cultural criticism. While false consciousness is imputed by intellectuals to religious groups and to certain social classes, unmasking is, or claims to be, a corrective performed by intellectuals themselves. Unmasking supposes that enlightened enquirers are able to help the less rational to understand their real interests; a type of exposure, it offers a cognitive tool of emancipation. This article (a) examines unmasking; and (b) contrasts it with an approach to understanding that we call disclosure. Our claim is that disclosure is more attuned to the full keyboard of social action, and less demeaning of its players, than unmasking is. Disclosure attempts to grasp what actions are like for those who enact them. Nothing has been more often or consistently unmasked and with more venom than religion. It is the main example explored in this article.

AB - Unmasking is a recurrent feature of modern sociology and cultural criticism. While false consciousness is imputed by intellectuals to religious groups and to certain social classes, unmasking is, or claims to be, a corrective performed by intellectuals themselves. Unmasking supposes that enlightened enquirers are able to help the less rational to understand their real interests; a type of exposure, it offers a cognitive tool of emancipation. This article (a) examines unmasking; and (b) contrasts it with an approach to understanding that we call disclosure. Our claim is that disclosure is more attuned to the full keyboard of social action, and less demeaning of its players, than unmasking is. Disclosure attempts to grasp what actions are like for those who enact them. Nothing has been more often or consistently unmasked and with more venom than religion. It is the main example explored in this article.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2287

U2 - 10.1177/1440783312458225

DO - 10.1177/1440783312458225

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 48

SP - 380

EP - 396

JO - Journal of Sociology

JF - Journal of Sociology

SN - 1440-7833

IS - 4

ER -