Unpacking the Link Between Hormonal Fluctuations and Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Bo YUAN*
  • , Dongyu GAO
  • , Rongjun YU
  • , Yi HUANG*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that hormonal fluctuations, specifically in testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol, may impact reward-related brain functioning and risk-taking behaviors. However, findings in this area have been inconsistent and sometimes contradictory. The current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of both endogenous and exogenous testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol on risk-taking behaviors, as well as identify potential moderators of these effects. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed studies published up to February 20, 2025, encompassing both correlational and experimental designs. After screening 2,544 records, 98 studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 162 effect sizes involving 8,676 participants for testosterone, 55 effect sizes from 2,510 participants for estradiol, and 66 effect sizes from 3,933 participants for cortisol. Using the random-effects Bayesian meta-analytic models, our results showed that both testosterone and estradiol had a significant, albeit modest, effect on increasing risk-taking behaviors (testosterone: Hedge’s g = 0.22; 95% CrI [0.14, 0.30]; estradiol: Hedge’s g = 0.20; 95% CrI [0.03, 0.37]). However, cortisol was not associated with changes in risk-taking (Hedge’s g = −0.04; 95% CrI [−0.17, 0.09]). Further analysis indicated that the effects of testosterone were moderated by the study design (experimental vs. correlational), the behavior type (sensation seeking vs. risk-taking vs. impulsivity), the measurement type of risky behavior (self-report vs. behavioral) and the measurement type of hormone (saliva vs. serum), but these moderators had no significant impact on the estradiol effect. Despite the potential for publication bias, no evidence of selective reporting (e.g. p-hacking) was found in the p-curve analysis. In summary, testosterone and estradiol may influence risk-taking behaviors, although further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these findings.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106215
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume175
Early online date20 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

This work was supported by the National Education Science Planning General Project in China “Research on Peer Influence and Cognitive Emotional Mechanism in Adolescents’ Moral Decision Making” [BBA210033] and the Graduate Student Scientific Research and Innovation Project of Ningbo University [IF2024009].

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cortisol
  • Estradiol
  • Meta-analysis
  • Moderator analysis
  • Risk-taking behavior
  • Testosterone
  • p-curve analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpacking the Link Between Hormonal Fluctuations and Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this