Was Confucius teaching us how to do things with words? Reflections on ethics in language and communication

Feifei ZHOU, Xiyin ZHOU

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

As observed by both western and Chinese scholars, despite the cultural and historical distance between them, the works of Confucius and J. L. Austin (together with other scholars of speech act theory) share similar views on the performative dimensions of language. Speech act theory underscores how utterances constitute actions instead of reporting inner mental states of the speakers, while Confucian texts also draw attention to the embeddedness of language in the wider contexts of personal affairs and social order. In this article, we conduct a detailed comparison of the two to demonstrate that their views on language and communication, although sharing some important concerns, differ significantly in two main aspects: (1) The relationship between one’s ‘internal’ cultivation and ‘external’ behaviours; (2) The conceptualization of language and ethics. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of a Confucian outlook for the study of language and communication and point out some directions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-200
Number of pages16
JournalEmpedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Language
Communication
Confucius
Teaching
Confucian
Speech Act Theory
Social Order
Mental State
Embeddedness
Conceptualization
J. L. Austin
Utterance

Cite this

@article{fcd2e8a84e0e4b5783d8c3129c8afa73,
title = "Was Confucius teaching us how to do things with words? Reflections on ethics in language and communication",
abstract = "As observed by both western and Chinese scholars, despite the cultural and historical distance between them, the works of Confucius and J. L. Austin (together with other scholars of speech act theory) share similar views on the performative dimensions of language. Speech act theory underscores how utterances constitute actions instead of reporting inner mental states of the speakers, while Confucian texts also draw attention to the embeddedness of language in the wider contexts of personal affairs and social order. In this article, we conduct a detailed comparison of the two to demonstrate that their views on language and communication, although sharing some important concerns, differ significantly in two main aspects: (1) The relationship between one’s ‘internal’ cultivation and ‘external’ behaviours; (2) The conceptualization of language and ethics. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of a Confucian outlook for the study of language and communication and point out some directions for future research.",
author = "Feifei ZHOU and Xiyin ZHOU",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/ejpc.9.2.185_1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "185--200",
journal = "Empedocles",
issn = "1757-1952",
publisher = "Intellect Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Was Confucius teaching us how to do things with words? Reflections on ethics in language and communication. / ZHOU, Feifei; ZHOU, Xiyin.

In: Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.11.2018, p. 185-200.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Was Confucius teaching us how to do things with words? Reflections on ethics in language and communication

AU - ZHOU, Feifei

AU - ZHOU, Xiyin

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - As observed by both western and Chinese scholars, despite the cultural and historical distance between them, the works of Confucius and J. L. Austin (together with other scholars of speech act theory) share similar views on the performative dimensions of language. Speech act theory underscores how utterances constitute actions instead of reporting inner mental states of the speakers, while Confucian texts also draw attention to the embeddedness of language in the wider contexts of personal affairs and social order. In this article, we conduct a detailed comparison of the two to demonstrate that their views on language and communication, although sharing some important concerns, differ significantly in two main aspects: (1) The relationship between one’s ‘internal’ cultivation and ‘external’ behaviours; (2) The conceptualization of language and ethics. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of a Confucian outlook for the study of language and communication and point out some directions for future research.

AB - As observed by both western and Chinese scholars, despite the cultural and historical distance between them, the works of Confucius and J. L. Austin (together with other scholars of speech act theory) share similar views on the performative dimensions of language. Speech act theory underscores how utterances constitute actions instead of reporting inner mental states of the speakers, while Confucian texts also draw attention to the embeddedness of language in the wider contexts of personal affairs and social order. In this article, we conduct a detailed comparison of the two to demonstrate that their views on language and communication, although sharing some important concerns, differ significantly in two main aspects: (1) The relationship between one’s ‘internal’ cultivation and ‘external’ behaviours; (2) The conceptualization of language and ethics. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of a Confucian outlook for the study of language and communication and point out some directions for future research.

U2 - 10.1386/ejpc.9.2.185_1

DO - 10.1386/ejpc.9.2.185_1

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 9

SP - 185

EP - 200

JO - Empedocles

JF - Empedocles

SN - 1757-1952

IS - 2

ER -