Weighing aims in doxastic deliberation

C. J. ATKINSON

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

In this paper, I defend teleological theories of belief against the exclusivity objection. I argue that despite the exclusive influence of truth in doxastic deliberation, multiple epistemic aims interact when we consider what to believe. This is apparent when we focus on the processes involved in specific instances (or concrete cases) of doxastic deliberation, such that the propositions under consideration are specified. First, I outline a general schema for weighing aims. Second, I discuss recent attempts to defend the teleological position in relation to this schema. And third, I develop and defend my proposal that multiple epistemic aims interact in doxastic deliberation—a possibility which, as of yet, has received no serious attention in the literature.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSynthese
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

deliberation
Deliberation
literature
Exclusivity

Bibliographical note

I’d like to thank my Ph.D. supervisors, Darrell Rowbottom and Jenny Nado, for their guidance during the Ph.D. process. It is due to their many helpful comments on drafts of my thesis that I have been able to write this paper. I’d also like to thank Andrea Sauchelli, Derek Baker, and Tinghao Wang for their detailed comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and an audience at the 2018 Frontiers of Epistemology conference at Yonsei University, Seoul, for their helpful feedback. And finally, I’d like to thank two anonymous referees for this journal, whose comments helped me to clarify a number of important points.

Keywords

  • Aim of belief
  • Belief
  • Doxastic deliberation
  • Exclusivity
  • Purposive
  • Teleological

Cite this

ATKINSON, C. J. / Weighing aims in doxastic deliberation. In: Synthese. 2019.
@article{726795ea4e2a44449962f3c8c039520a,
title = "Weighing aims in doxastic deliberation",
abstract = "In this paper, I defend teleological theories of belief against the exclusivity objection. I argue that despite the exclusive influence of truth in doxastic deliberation, multiple epistemic aims interact when we consider what to believe. This is apparent when we focus on the processes involved in specific instances (or concrete cases) of doxastic deliberation, such that the propositions under consideration are specified. First, I outline a general schema for weighing aims. Second, I discuss recent attempts to defend the teleological position in relation to this schema. And third, I develop and defend my proposal that multiple epistemic aims interact in doxastic deliberation—a possibility which, as of yet, has received no serious attention in the literature.",
keywords = "Aim of belief, Belief, Doxastic deliberation, Exclusivity, Purposive, Teleological",
author = "ATKINSON, {C. J.}",
note = "I’d like to thank my Ph.D. supervisors, Darrell Rowbottom and Jenny Nado, for their guidance during the Ph.D. process. It is due to their many helpful comments on drafts of my thesis that I have been able to write this paper. I’d also like to thank Andrea Sauchelli, Derek Baker, and Tinghao Wang for their detailed comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and an audience at the 2018 Frontiers of Epistemology conference at Yonsei University, Seoul, for their helpful feedback. And finally, I’d like to thank two anonymous referees for this journal, whose comments helped me to clarify a number of important points.",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-019-02360-0",
language = "English",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Weighing aims in doxastic deliberation. / ATKINSON, C. J.

In: Synthese, 12.08.2019.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weighing aims in doxastic deliberation

AU - ATKINSON, C. J.

N1 - I’d like to thank my Ph.D. supervisors, Darrell Rowbottom and Jenny Nado, for their guidance during the Ph.D. process. It is due to their many helpful comments on drafts of my thesis that I have been able to write this paper. I’d also like to thank Andrea Sauchelli, Derek Baker, and Tinghao Wang for their detailed comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and an audience at the 2018 Frontiers of Epistemology conference at Yonsei University, Seoul, for their helpful feedback. And finally, I’d like to thank two anonymous referees for this journal, whose comments helped me to clarify a number of important points.

PY - 2019/8/12

Y1 - 2019/8/12

N2 - In this paper, I defend teleological theories of belief against the exclusivity objection. I argue that despite the exclusive influence of truth in doxastic deliberation, multiple epistemic aims interact when we consider what to believe. This is apparent when we focus on the processes involved in specific instances (or concrete cases) of doxastic deliberation, such that the propositions under consideration are specified. First, I outline a general schema for weighing aims. Second, I discuss recent attempts to defend the teleological position in relation to this schema. And third, I develop and defend my proposal that multiple epistemic aims interact in doxastic deliberation—a possibility which, as of yet, has received no serious attention in the literature.

AB - In this paper, I defend teleological theories of belief against the exclusivity objection. I argue that despite the exclusive influence of truth in doxastic deliberation, multiple epistemic aims interact when we consider what to believe. This is apparent when we focus on the processes involved in specific instances (or concrete cases) of doxastic deliberation, such that the propositions under consideration are specified. First, I outline a general schema for weighing aims. Second, I discuss recent attempts to defend the teleological position in relation to this schema. And third, I develop and defend my proposal that multiple epistemic aims interact in doxastic deliberation—a possibility which, as of yet, has received no serious attention in the literature.

KW - Aim of belief

KW - Belief

KW - Doxastic deliberation

KW - Exclusivity

KW - Purposive

KW - Teleological

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070926473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-019-02360-0

DO - 10.1007/s11229-019-02360-0

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

ER -