What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience

Leonard K. CHENG; Yum K. KWAN

doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00032-X

What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience

Leonard K. CHENG^*, Yum K. KWAN

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications › Journal Article (refereed) › peer-review

514 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By estimating the effects of the determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 29 Chinese regions from 1985 to 1995, we find that large regional market, good infrastructure, and preferential policy had a positive effect but wage cost had a negative effect on FDI. The effect of education was positive but not statistically significant. In addition, there was also a strong self-reinforcing effect of FDI on itself. There was no convergence in the equilibrium FDI stocks of the regions between 1985 and 1995, but there was convergence in the deviations from the equilibrium FDI stocks. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	379-400
Number of pages	22
Journal	Journal of International Economics
Volume	51
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00032-X
Publication status	Published - 1 Aug 2000
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Dynamic panel regression
Foreign direct investment
Partial stock adjustment
Positive feedback effect
Self-reinforcing effect

Access to Document

10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00032-X

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{ff782293606f46ce8a9915fbd9a15cdd,

title = "What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience",

abstract = "By estimating the effects of the determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 29 Chinese regions from 1985 to 1995, we find that large regional market, good infrastructure, and preferential policy had a positive effect but wage cost had a negative effect on FDI. The effect of education was positive but not statistically significant. In addition, there was also a strong self-reinforcing effect of FDI on itself. There was no convergence in the equilibrium FDI stocks of the regions between 1985 and 1995, but there was convergence in the deviations from the equilibrium FDI stocks. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.",

keywords = "Dynamic panel regression, Foreign direct investment, Partial stock adjustment, Positive feedback effect, Self-reinforcing effect",

author = "CHENG, {Leonard K.} and KWAN, {Yum K.}",

year = "2000",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00032-X",

language = "English",

volume = "51",

pages = "379--400",

journal = "Journal of International Economics",

issn = "0022-1996",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience

AU - CHENG, Leonard K.

AU - KWAN, Yum K.

PY - 2000/8/1

Y1 - 2000/8/1

N2 - By estimating the effects of the determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 29 Chinese regions from 1985 to 1995, we find that large regional market, good infrastructure, and preferential policy had a positive effect but wage cost had a negative effect on FDI. The effect of education was positive but not statistically significant. In addition, there was also a strong self-reinforcing effect of FDI on itself. There was no convergence in the equilibrium FDI stocks of the regions between 1985 and 1995, but there was convergence in the deviations from the equilibrium FDI stocks. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - By estimating the effects of the determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) in 29 Chinese regions from 1985 to 1995, we find that large regional market, good infrastructure, and preferential policy had a positive effect but wage cost had a negative effect on FDI. The effect of education was positive but not statistically significant. In addition, there was also a strong self-reinforcing effect of FDI on itself. There was no convergence in the equilibrium FDI stocks of the regions between 1985 and 1995, but there was convergence in the deviations from the equilibrium FDI stocks. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Dynamic panel regression

KW - Foreign direct investment

KW - Partial stock adjustment

KW - Positive feedback effect

KW - Self-reinforcing effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033937449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00032-X

DO - 10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00032-X

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

AN - SCOPUS:0033937449

VL - 51

SP - 379

EP - 400

JO - Journal of International Economics

JF - Journal of International Economics

SN - 0022-1996

IS - 2

ER -