Abstract
We reviewed 555 papers published from 2016–2022 that presented misinformation to participants. We identified several trends in the literature—increasing frequency of misinformation studies over time, a wide variety of topics covered, and a significant focus on COVID-19 misinformation since 2020. We also identified several important shortcomings, including overrepresentation of samples from the United States and Europe and excessive emphasis on short-term consequences of brief, text-based misinformation. Most studies examined belief in misinformation as the primary outcome. While many researchers identified behavioural consequences of misinformation exposure as a pressing concern, we observed a lack of research directly investigating behaviour change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 57 |
| Journal | Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, Harvard Kennedy School. All rights reserved.
Funding
This project was funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland – COV19-2020-030. The funding body had no role in the design, interpretation, or reporting of the research.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What do we study when we study misinformation? A scoping review of experimental research (2016-2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver